Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 31 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MONi i ORING VERIFICAt[ON IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements project is also expected to increase traffic another through travel lane, with a capacity five years after volumes by more than one percent of the of 2,300 vehicles per lane per hour, would full project freeway segment's capacity during the PM more than offset the addition of project buildout peak hour. This effect would represent a traffic (the project -- Alternative 6 - -is expected significant cumulative impact. to add approximately 95 trips to this freeway segment). However, freeway widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on this freeway segment is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -26: Cumulative (2020) With and Mitigation 7 -26. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Without Project Impact on U.S. 101 impacts on these freeway segments by City program (incl. program prior to Southbound Mixed -Flow Lanes, Whipple implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Avenue to Woodside Road and Woodside management (TDM) program, as described development Road to Marsh Road Segments - -PM Peak under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement Hour. Capacity analysis results indicate that approval; annual the V/C ratio for southbound mixed -flow (i.e., Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less- City review of non -HOV) lanes along these two freeway than - significant level) would require the TDM program segments under Cumulative Conditions would addition of another southbound through lane annual report be greater than 1.0 (with and without the to each freeway segment. The addition of continuing for proposed project). The project is expected to another through travel lane, with a capacity five years after increase volumes by more than one percent of of 2,300 vehicles per lane per hour, would full project the segments' capacity during the PM peak more than offset the addition of project buildout hour. This effect would represent a traffic (the project -- Alternative 6 - -is expected significant cumulative impact to add approximately 118 trips and 149 trips to each freeway segment). However, freeway widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on this freeway segment is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -27: Cumulative (2020) With and Mitigation 7 -27. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Without Project Impact on Eastbound SR impacts on these SR 84 segments by City program (incl. program prior to 84, Willow Road to University Avenue and implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 31 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645