Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 30 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MOM i ORING VERIFICA t ION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requiremen.6 widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on this freeway segment is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -24: Cumulative (2020) With and Mitigation 7 -24. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Without Project Impact on Westbound SR impacts on these two SR 84 segments by City program (incl. program prior to 84, County Line to University Avenue and implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ University Avenue to Willow Road management (TDM) program, as described development Segments - -AM Peak Hour. Capacity under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement analysis results indicate that the V/C ratio for approval; annual these two SR 84 segments under Cumulative Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less- City review of Conditions would be greater than 1.0 (with and than significant level) would require the without the proposed project). The project is addition of another westbound through lane TDM program expected to increase traffic volumes by more to both segments. The addition of another annual report continuing for than one percent of the segments' capacity through travel lane, with a design capacity of five years after during the AM peak hour. This effect would 1,100 vehicles per lane per hour, would full project represent a significant cumulative impact. more than offset the addition of project buildout traffic (the project -- Alternative 6 - -is expected to add 51 trips to the segments). However, freeway widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on these segments is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e.. would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -25: Cumulative (2020) With Mitigation 7 -25. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Project Impact on U.S. 101 Southbound impacts on this freeway segment by City program (incl. program prior to Mixed -Flow Lanes, SR 92 to Whipple Road implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Segment - -PM Peak Hour. Capacity analysis management (TDM) program, as described development results indicate that the V/C ratio for under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement southbound mixed -flow (i.e., non -HOV) lanes along this freeway segment under Cumulative Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less- approval; annual Conditions would be less than 1.0 without the than - significant level) would require the City review of I proposed project. The project is expected to addition of another southbound through lane TDM program increase the V/C ratio to more than 1.0. The to the freeway segment. The addition of annual report continuing for Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 30 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645