Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 29 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MOk, . JRING VERIFIC.., iON IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements difficult due to the significant volume of heavy trucks at the intersection. Impact 7 -22: Cumulative (2020) With and Mitigation 7 -22. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Without Project Impact on U.S. 101 impacts on this freeway segment by City program (incl. program prior to Southbound Mixed -Flow Lanes, Whipple implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Avenue to Woodside Road Segment - -AM management (TDM) program, as described development Peak Hour. Capacity analysis results indicate under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement that the volume -to- capacity (V /C) ratio for southbound mixed -flow (i.e., non -HOV) lanes Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less approval; annual along this U.S. 101 freeway segment under than - significant level) would require the City review of Cumulative Conditions would be greater than addition of another southbound through lane TDM program 1.0 (with and without the proposed project). to the freeway segment. The addition of annual report The project is expected to increase traffic another through travel lane, with a design continuing for volumes by more than one percent of the capacity of 2,300 vehicles per lane per hour, five years after freeway segment's capacity during the AM would more than offset the addition of o project full ll pr prj peak hour. This effect would represent a project traffic (the project -- Alternative 6 - -is significant cumulative impact. expected to add approximately 130 trips to this freeway segment). However, freeway widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on this freeway segment is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -23: Cumulative (2020) With and Mitigation 7 -23. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Without Project Impact on U.S. 101 impacts on this freeway segment by City program (incl. program prior to Southbound Mixed -Flow Lanes, Woodside implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Road to Marsh Road Segment —AM Peak management (TDM) program, as described development Hour. Capacity analysis results indicate that under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement the V/C ratio for southbound mixed -flow (i.e., approval; annual non HOV) lanes along this U.S. 101 freeway Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less segment under Cumulative Conditions would than- significant level) would require the City review of be greater than 1.0 (with and without the addition of another southbound through lane TDM program proposed project). The project is expected to to the freeway segment. The addition of annual report increase traffic volumes by more than one another through travel lane, with a capacity continuing for percent of the freeway segment's capacity of 2,300 vehicles per lane per hour, would five years after during the AM peak hour. This effect would more than offset the addition of project -- project full ll pr oprj represent a significant cumulative impact. Alternative 6 -- traffic (the project is expected to add approximately 113 trips to this freeway segment). However, freeway Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 29 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645