My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res07 14769
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res07 14769
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:56:07 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:55:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2007
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS CONCERNING MITIGATION MEASURES, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE REDWOOD CITY DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~ MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />IDEN~D IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br />v N (3} Salvage. If the affected historic <br />o resource can neither be preserved at its <br />,p current site nor moved to an alternative site <br />fD and is demolished, the project applicant <br />~ <br />O shall consult with the Redwood City Historic <br /> Resources Advisory Committee and other <br />~ local historical societies regarding savage . <br />~ of materials from the affected historic <br />W <br />resource for public information or reuse in <br /> other IocaBons. Demolition may proceed <br /> only after any significant historic features or <br /> materials have been identified and their <br /> removal completed. <br /> (4) Commemoration. If the affected <br /> historic resource can neither be preserved <br /> at its current site nor moved to an <br /> alternative site and is demolished, the <br /> project applicant shall, with the assistance <br /> of the Redwood (:ity Historic Resources <br /> Advisory Committee or other professionals <br /> experienced in creating historical exhibits, <br /> incorporate a wall display featuring historic <br /> photos of the affected resource and a <br /> description of its historical significance into <br /> the publicly accessible portion of any <br /> subse uent develo ment on the site. <br /> <br />TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCUL4TION <br />Impact 9-1: Impact on Mitigation 9-1. The intersection of City; fair-share City; ClCAG If and when improvements <br />BroadwayiWoodside Road (SR 84) Broadway and Woodside Road (SR 84) reimbursement .adopted, City shall conduct <br />Intersection--Maximum intensity Precise curcently has five approach legs. The fifth from future ;annual traffic monitoring at <br />Plan Alternative. During the AM peak hour, leg of this intersection (the southbound US <br />101 off-ramp} is a major contributing factor individual <br />project this intersection and <br />implement improvement and <br />the Maximum Intensity project traffic <br />increment would reduce the level of service to poor intersection operations. Currently applicants. fair-share requirement when <br />{LOS) and increase average delay by more the San Mateo County Transportation 3eve1 of service reaches LOS <br />E (average delay of greater <br />than five (5) seconds at the Authority (SMCTA} is studying improvement <br />options for the US 101NVoodside Road <br />i than 55 seconds). Individual <br />on. <br />Broadway/Woodside Road intersect <br />During the PM peak hour, the Maximum interchange. One of the options would projects may require <br />Transportation Demand <br />Intensity project would increase the average include modifications of this intersection to <br />which would already a standard 4-Veg configuration. At this time, <br />dela~t this intersection Management (TDM) plans per <br />li <br />/ <br />d <br />id <br />G <br />, <br />be o rating at LOS F, by more than five (5} however, no feasible modifications have nes. <br />gu <br />e <br />CA <br />adopte <br />C <br />sea~~ hose changes would represent a been identified with implementation <br />sig t impact, assured to allow this intersection to operate <br />j ~ at an acceptable level of service: therefore, <br />~,,> ~p the addition of Maximum Intensity project <br />traffic is expected to result in a significant <br />unavoidable impact <br /> <br />Page 7 U:1My OocumentstDownfown Precise Plan!CC staff reoorislCC 3.12.doc13.12.07 ExhibitslAttarhment A mit.mavfoorrg check!rst 655.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.