My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res07 14769
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res07 14769
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:56:07 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:55:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2007
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS CONCERNING MITIGATION MEASURES, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE REDWOOD CITY DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MONITORING VERIF{CATION <br />IDEND IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br /> Enti Verification Enti Re uirements <br />~~,,,,c~L~ <br />Impaci~= impact Middlefield Roadf Mitigation 9-2. The addition of a second City; fair-share <br />t City; C/CAG If and when improvements <br />City shall implement <br />adopted <br />Woodsicf~Road (SR 84) Intersection-- <br />i eastbound left-turn lane on Woodside Road <br />(SR 84) would achieve LOS D conditions reimbursemen <br />from future , <br />improvements and fair-share <br />an <br />Maximur~]ntensity Precise P <br />Alternat~. During the PM peak hour, the under Maximum intensity conditions. This individual <br />t requirement. Individual <br />projects may require <br />MaximuntDintensity project traffic increment improvement, however, would require <br />intersection widening to provide adequate projec <br />applicants. Transportation Demand <br />would increase b more than five 5) seconds <br />y ( length for the additional left-turn lane. The Management (TDM) plans per <br />the aver delay at the <br />Middlefi oodside intersection, which is <br />improvement would also require Caltrans CICAG adopted guidelir~irs. <br />already operating at LOS E. This change approval, which is uncertain at this time. <br />would represent a significant impact Therefore, because implementation of this <br /> improvement is not assured, this <br /> intersection impact would be a significant <br /> unavoidable im ct. <br />Impact 9-3: Impact on Middlefield Road! Mitigation 9-3(a). Restripe the southbound City; fair-share City <br />reimbursement If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />Jefferson Avenue Intersection--Maximum <br />i <br />D approach of Middlefield Road to one <br />through lane and one right-turn lane, and from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />ng <br />ur <br />Intensity Precise Ptan Alternative. <br />the PM peak hour, the Maximum Intensity prohibit southbound left turns. These individual this intersection and <br />implement fair-share <br />project traffic increment would reduce the chan es would result in an acceptable LOS project <br />9 <br />D under the Maximum Intensity alternative, applicants. re uirement when level of <br />q <br />level of service to LOS E and increase <br />average delay by more than five {5) seconds thereby reducng the project impact to a service reaches LOS E <br />(average delay of greater than <br />at the intersection of Middlefield Road/ Jess-Phan-significant level. 55 seconds). <br />Jefferson Avenue. This change would <br />represent a sigrrffrcant impact. <br />or <br />Mitigation S-3(b). Implement Mitigation 9- <br /> 3(a) plus restripe northbound Middlefield <br /> Road to two {2) left-turn lanes and one <br /> shared throughlrigh#-turn Pane. These <br /> changes would result in an acceptable LOS <br /> D under the Maximum Intensity buildout <br /> alternative, thereby reducing the project <br /> impact to a lesa~-than-significant level. <br /> or <br /> Mitigation 9-3(c). Restripe the southbound <br /> Middlefield Roast approach to a shared left- <br /> through lane and one right-turn lane; <br /> restripe northbound Middlefield Road to <br /> one left-turn lane, one shared left-through <br /> and one right turn lane; and <br />lane <br /> , <br />implement a split phase signal operation for <br /> northbound and southbound Middlefield <br /> Road. These changes would result in an <br />~ acceptable LOS D under the Maximum <br /> Intensity alternative, thereby reducing the <br />= <br />~ , project impact to a less-fhan-sigrtifrcant <br />~ ~ level. <br />~ ~ <br />W ~ or <br />Because either the diversion of traffic to <br /> pedestrian corridors on Broadway and <br /> Middlefield resuitin from rohibitin <br /> <br />UaMy DocurrentslDowntown Precise PIar,ICC staff r2portstCC 3.12.doc13.12.07 ExhrhifscAfachment A mil. mrnitorag c"eckli;t 655.doc <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.