Laserfiche WebLink
p MONITORING ___. VERIFICATION <br />.». <br />IDEND IMPACT <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />implementation <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br /> Enti Verff[cation Enti Re uirements <br />v m southbound left toms (Mitigations 9-3(aJ or <br />O 9-3(bJ), or the impact on pedestrian signal <br />Z7 sequencing with split phase signal <br />~ operation {Mitigation 9-3(cn, may potentially <br />~ degrade the Downtown pedestrian <br /> environment and decrease pedestrian <br />p safety, comfort, and convenience; and be ,, <br />~ inconsistent with existing and proposed City <br />W <br />polices giving priority to the Downtown <br /> pedestrian environment; the City may <br /> choose to avoid the three mitigation options <br /> identified above in the interest of protecting <br /> the pedestrian environment. This choice <br /> would result in a sfgnificanf unavoidable <br /> impact under the current CEQA and City <br /> criteria for "Intersection Im acts." <br />impact 9-4: Impact on Broadway/Jefferson Mitigation 9-4. Add an exclusive City; fair-share City If and when improvements <br />Avenue intersection--Maximum Intensity northbound left-turn lane on Broadway, and reimbursement adopted, City shall conduct <br />Precise Plan Alternative. During the PM convert the existing northbound shared left- from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />the Maximum Intensity project <br />peak hour through right lane into a shared individual this intersection and <br />, <br />traffic increment would reduce operation to through right-turn lane. These changes <br />would result in an acceptable LOS D under project <br />applicants. implement fair-share <br />requirement when level of <br />LOS F and increase average delay by more <br />than five {5} seconds at the Broadway/ the Maximum Intensity alternative, thereby service reaches LOS E <br />Jefferson Avenue intersection. This change reducing this impact to a less-than- (average delay of greater than <br />would represent a significant impact, significant level. 55 seconds). <br /> or <br /> Because this mitigation would result in the <br /> loss of sidewalk at corner bulb-outs, <br /> degrading the existing and future <br /> pedestrian environment and sidewalk <br /> dining opportunities, and would therefore <br /> be inconsistent with City policies giving <br /> priority to the Downtown pedestrian <br /> environment, the City may choose to avoid <br /> these intersection modifications in the <br /> interest of protecting the pedestrian <br /> environment. This choice would result in a <br /> sfgnificani unavoidable impact under <br /> current CEQA and City criteria for <br /> "intersection Im acts." <br />Imps 9-5: impact BroadwaylMiddlefieid Mitigation 9-5. The intersection of City; fair-share City if and when improvements <br />Roar~jttersection-Maximum Intensity Broadway/Middlefield Road is currently a 4- reimbursement adopted, City shall wnduct <br />t <br />it <br />i <br />l t <br />ff <br />~e~lan Alternative. During the PM <br />Prec way stop controlled facility. Signalizing the from future ng a <br />annua <br />ra <br />ic mon <br />or <br />thi <br />i <br />t <br />ti <br />d <br />, <br />peaNfl>fowl the Maximum Intensity project intersection (2-phase control) would result individual <br />t s <br />n <br />ersec <br />on an <br />implement fair-share <br />traffiy~ ment would reduce operation to <br />LOSE increase average delay by more in LOS B operations under Maximum <br />Intensity conditions. implementation of this projec <br />applicants. requirement when level of <br />W <br />N <br />v <br />N <br />O <br />v <br />Page 9 U:IMy Documen?siDownfown Precise P;an',.GG staflreoo, s1CC 3.14.doct3. 12.07 ExhibitslAt?achment A mitmon;?orrng c~etk!ist E55.doc <br />