My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res07 14769
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2000-2009
>
Res07 14769
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 9:56:07 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 9:55:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/26/2007
Description
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS CONCERNING MITIGATION MEASURES, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, MAKING FINDINGS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVES, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE REDWOOD CITY DOWNTOWN PRECISE PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />IDEN~1FjED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br />~ ~ Enti Verification Hnti Re uiren~nts <br />than fbf:~) seconds at the intersection of measure would result in aless-than- service reaches LOS E <br />Broadwa~Mtddlefield Road. This change significant impacf. (average delay of greater than <br />would resent a significant impact. 55 seconds). <br />fD ~ <br />~ <br />O Because this mitigation action would: (a) <br /> be less supportive of pedestrian <br />~ convenience and orientation than the -i <br />~ <br />W existing 4-way stop due to delays to <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> walk <br />pedestrians waiting to cross during <br /> phases and higher vehicle speeds through <br /> the intersection; (b) be inconsistent with <br /> City intentions for this intersection to be <br /> pedestrian-oriented given ifs location in the <br /> Downtown core; and (c) be inconsistent <br /> with the existing. and proposed City policies <br /> giving priority to the Downtown pedestrian <br /> environment, the City may choose to avoid <br /> this intersection modification in the interest <br /> of protecting the pedestrian environment <br /> This choice would result in a sfgnificant <br /> unavoidable impacf undercurrent CEQA <br /> and Ci criteria for °Intersection Im acts." <br />Impact 9-6: Impacts on US 101 Freeway Mitigation 9-6. Mitigation of these effects Infrastructure City; C/CAG During project-specific <br />environmental review <br />Segments-Maximum intensity Precise to aless-than-signifipnt level would require improvements <br />Plan Alternative. Traffic generated by the construction of an additional mixed flow <br />i <br />t considered not <br />feasible by City; <br />proposed Maximum Intensity alternative is <br />expected to result in the following freeway s no <br />cane on US 101. This widening <br />deemed feasible by the City due to right-of- however, U5 <br />segment operational effects: way constraints and cost. Therefore, the 101 is part of <br /> impact is expected to remain significant CMP roadway <br />= southbound US 101 (mixed flow) and unavoidable. system, and <br />individual <br />lanes between Woodside Road and projects may <br />Marsh Road (AM)--a V1C ratio change <br />from 0.95 to 1.21 (an increase in require <br />Transportation <br />volume exceeding segment capacity); Demand <br />and Management <br />• southbound US 101 (mixed flow) (TDM) plans per <br />C/CAG adopted <br />Panes between Whipple Avenue and guidelines: <br />Woodside Road (PM}--a V!C ratio <br />change from 1.14 to 1.19 (an increase <br />~ of more than one percent in a freeway <br />e segment already exceeding its <br />~ capacity}. <br />~~ <br />The~f(~way segment effects would <br />repre?~a significant impact. <br />Page i0 UaMy DocumentslDowntown Precise PlanICC staff reportstCC 3.12.doc13.12.07 EzhibitstAttachme~~?t A mrt.monitorrng checklrsf 655.doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.