Res07 14769 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~ MONITORING VERIFICATION IDEND IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Enti Verification Ent' Re uirements ~ N with City policies giving priority to the O Downtown pedestrian environment, the City ~ may choose to avoid this intersection fD modification in the interest of protecting the N O pedestrian environment. This choice would ~ result in a significant unavoidable impact py based on current CE4A and City criteria for ~ "Intersection Im acts." Impact 9-10: impacts on US 101 Freeway Mitigation 5-10. Mitigation of these effects infrastructure City; C/CAG During project-specific environmental review Segments--Moderate Intensity Precise to aless-than-significant level would require improvements Plan Alternative. Traffic generated by the construction of an additional mixed flow This widening is not lane on US 141 considered not feasible by City; proposed Moderate Intensity alternative is expected to result in the following freeway . deemed feasible by the City due to right-of- however, US segment operational effects: way constraints and cost. Therefore, the 101 is part of impact is expected to remain significant CMP roadway southbound US 1D1 (mixed flow) and unavoidable. system, and individual lanes between Woodside Road and projects may Marsh Road {AM}--a V/C ratio change require from 1.14 to of 1.20; and Transportation southbound US 101 (mixed flow) Demand Management lanes between Whipple Avenue and (TDM) plans per Woodside Road (PM)--a VJC ratio C/CAG adopted change from 1.15 to 1.18. guidelines. These changes in freeway segment operations would represent a sfgnificanf im act. Impact 9-11: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-11. Add a second left-turn City; fair-share City If and when improvements City shall conduct imbursement adopted Cumulative Impacts at the Alameda de las lane to the southbound approach of This change tvouid Alameda de las Pulgas , re from future annual traffic monitoring at . PulgaslWoodside Road Intersection. During the AM and PM peak hours, the improve operation to LOS D in both peak individual this intersection and t implement fair••share addition of project traffic would reduce the periods. The project would require median removal and lane restriping. Although Phis projec applicants. requirement when level of level of service (AM peak hour) and increase ro ect ma be added to Redwood City's P 1 Y d service reaches LOS E s overall delay by more than five (5) secon Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program in a future i (average delay of greater than on. (AM and PM peak hours) at this intersect which would already be operating at LOS E/F. update, there is currently no funding for this 55 seconds). This effect would represent a significant project. Therefore, the mitigation is not assured and this impact is considered to be impact. si nitycant and unavoidable. Imp~t 9-12: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-12. Due to right-of-way t thi Infrastructure improvements City; C/CAG During project-specific environmental review Cuttt~lative impacts at the EI Camino and s constraints, mitigation options a Mitigation would tersection are limited i considered not Wht~venue Intersection. During the AM an M peak hours the addition of project . n require the addition of an exclusive feasible by City; trafftaMIIUld increase average delay by more eastbound left-turn lane and converting the however, EI Camino/ than five (5) seconds at this intersection, eastbound shared left-through Pane into an excusive through movement. This would Whipple is a _ which would airead be o eratin at LOS F. Page 13 U:4My DocwnentslDownfo>"m Precise PlaniCC staff reportstCC 3.12:doc13. f2.07 ExhibitslAttachment A m$.mnnrtering checklist 655.doc