Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING VERIFICATION <br />iDEND IMPACT RELATED MiTiGATiON MEASURE implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date <br />v ~ EnY Verification Enti R uirements <br />This et7t~c~vould represent a significant allow changing from a current split-phase CMP <br />impact O operation (eastbound/westbound} to a intersection, <br /> protected left-tum phasing, and would and individual <br />~ improve operation to LOS D in the AM peak projects may <br />0 hour and to LOS E in the PM peak hour. require <br />0 However, implementation of this Transportation <br />~ improvement is not deemed feasible by the Demand <br />po City due to the need to acquire right-of-way Management _ <br />W from adjacent commercial frontage. (TDM) plans per <br /> Therefore, this impact is considered to be CICAG adopted <br /> s1 niTicanf and unavoidable. uidelines. <br />Impact 9-13: Project Contribution to <br />i/ <br />Et C <br />i <br />R Mitigation 9-13. Mitigating this impact <br />uire adding a second northbound <br />would re City: fair-share <br />reimbursement City; CICAG If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />am <br />no <br />ea <br />Cumulative Impacts at the <br />Jefferson Avenue Intersection. During the q <br />left-turn lane on Ei Camino Real, anti from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />PM peak hour, the addition of project traffic wnverting the right turn lane into a shared individual <br />t this intersection and <br />implement fair-share <br />would increase average delay by five (5) through/right-tum lane. This improvement <br />would necessitate lane restriping and projec <br />applicants. requirement when level of <br />seconds or more at this intersection, which <br />would already be operating at LOS E. This possible median modifications. Level of <br />i service reaches LOS E <br />{average delay of greater than <br />effect would re resent a si nificanf im act. <br />p 9 p n <br />service with this improvement would rema individual <br />55 seconds) <br /> LOS E during the PM peak hour, but the . <br />projects may require <br /> increase in delay resulting from project <br />traffic would be less than 5 seconds. Any Transportation Demand <br /> Improvement to El Camino Real would Management (TDM) plans per <br /> require Caltrans approval. At this time, CICAG adopted guidelines. <br /> lacking Ca[trans approval, implementation <br /> of this mitigation is not assured. Therefore, <br /> this impact is considered to be significant <br /> and unavoidable. <br />Impact 9-14: Project Contribution to Mitigation 9-14. The addition of a second City; fair-share <br />t <br />i <br />b City; CICAG If and when improvements <br />City shall conduct <br />adopted <br />Cumulative Impacts at the Middlefield eastbound left turn lane on Woodside Road ursemen <br />re <br />m <br />from future , <br />annual traffic monitoring at <br />RoadNVoodside Road intersection. During <br />the project traffic <br />the AM and PM peak hour (SR 84) would reduce the overall <br />intersection delay withouf the project during individual this intersection and <br />i <br />h <br />, <br />would increase average delay by five (5) the PM peak hour, but the delay without the <br />AM project <br />applicants are <br />r-s <br />implement fa <br />requirement when level of <br />seconds or more at the intersection of projecf would remain significant in the . service reaches LOS E <br />Middlefield Road/Woodside Road, which peak hour. With the addition of the second {average delay of greater than <br />would already be operating at LOS ElF. This eastbound left-turn lane, the intersection 55 seconds). Individual <br />effect would represent a slgntFcant impact. would still operate at LOS F in both the AM projects may require <br /> and PM peak hours with the project. In Transportation Demand <br /> addition, any improvement to Woodside Management (TDM} plans per <br /> Road (SR 84) would require Caltrans C/CAG adopted guidelines. <br />~ approval. Caltrans approve( for this <br />O mitigation is not assured. For these <br />~ ~ reasons, this impact is considered to be <br />*k ~ si nlfrcant and unavoidable. <br />Imp 5: Project Contribution to <br />~ Mitigation 9-15{a}. Restripe the <br />outhbound approach of Middlefield Road City; fair-share <br />reimbursement City If and when improvements <br />adopted, City shall conduct <br />e Impacts at the Middlefield <br />Cumula <br />RoadtJefferson Avenue intersection, s <br />to one through lane and one right-him lane, from future annual traffic monitoring at <br />O <br />W <br />N <br />v <br />N <br />O <br />v <br />Page 14 U:IMy DocumerisiCowntown Precise PIan1CC staff repoRslCC 3, f2.doc13. 12.07 ExhibitslAtfachmenf A mit mUniforing checklist 655.doc <br />