My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res89 11190
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
1980-1989
>
Res89 11190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 1:52:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2019 1:52:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Date
12/4/1989
Description
RES 0 L UTI 0 N N O. 11190 R D - 89-1 9 Or)lG"~'lI\L fd 'l!hii RES 0 L UTI 0 N N O. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY ADOPTING FINDINGS FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT EXPECTED TO BE CAUSED BY APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.2, MAKING STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CWM:djm ll/06/89 (098/#25) <br />CWM: d j m ./ 29 / 8 9 R <br /> <br />the City and many others will choose to live outside <br /> <br />the Ci ty . <br /> <br />Because there are no specific development <br /> <br />proj ects planned at this time it is not known when <br /> <br />"in-commuter" housing needs would be generated, nor <br /> <br />is the magnitude of the need known at any point in <br /> <br />time. <br /> <br />Housing <br /> <br />demands <br /> <br />generated <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />future <br /> <br />development should be assessed during site specific <br /> <br />project and environmental review. <br /> <br />Developers of <br /> <br />those projects could be required to participate in <br /> <br />the mitigation of those impacts which would render <br /> <br />impacts in the areas of housing insignificant. <br /> <br />2. Target Set-Aside Funds. The Redevelopment <br /> <br />Agency should target "set-aside funds" to provide <br /> <br />housing for moderate, <br /> <br />low and very low income <br /> <br />households. <br /> <br />Housing funds <br /> <br />should be <br /> <br />spent in <br /> <br />proportion <br /> <br />to ABAG's <br /> <br />housing <br /> <br />need <br /> <br />figures <br /> <br />as <br /> <br />published in the Housing Needs Determination. <br /> <br />3. Negotiate With Private Developers. The Agency <br /> <br />should negotiate with private developers to maximize <br /> <br />the amount of low and moderate income housing in the <br /> <br />Redevelopment Area beyond the statutory minimums, and <br /> <br />to use its best efforts to encourage housing for <br /> <br />large households. <br /> <br />This is already the practice in <br /> <br />Redwood City. The Redevelopment Agency will continue <br /> <br />to follow its practice of discussing with interested <br /> <br />parties, the extent to which tax increment funds can <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />11190 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.