Res89 11191 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Letter No. 3 Comment 3: Response: Letter No. 4 Comment 4-a: Response: Comment 4-b and correction of such conditions may require the imposition of design, development, or use requirements on the standard properties in the event they are rehabilitated or redeveloped by their owners; (3) because such properties will share in the physical, social and economic benefits which accrue to the area through the elimination of substandard conditions, including the replacement or provision of new public improvements and facilities serving the Amended Project; and (4) because such properties are part of a blighted area. Business owner protests "the inclusion of the industrial area bounded by Spring Street on the South and Charter Street on the east and Veterans Boulevard on the North in the Redevelopment Area" and comments that "this area is primarily a light industrial area, well developed and well constructed, and should not be considered for redevelopment." See Response to Comment No.2. The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County on behalf of a resident of the Amendment Area makes the following objections: The FEIR should not be certified and should be circulated for further public comment. Section l5089(b) of "CEQA: The Guidelines" states that "Lead Agencies may provide an opportunity for review of the Final EIR by the public or by commenting agencies before approving the project." The discussion following this section further states, "This section specifies that agencies need not provide a separate review period for the final EIR...It requires public review only at the draft EIR stage. The Final EIR can be submitted directly to the decision-making body of an agency for consideration." The Amendment Area is not blighted and is not predominated by social and economic ills. 2 11191 4