My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC19-16 0098 PC Reso 910 Woodside Road
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2019
>
Reso PC19-16 0098 PC Reso 910 Woodside Road
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2019 2:18:17 PM
Creation date
10/21/2019 2:17:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
10/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Development Department shall confirm that the project applicant(s) <br />have retained a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the potential historic <br />significance of the resource(s). If the deposits are determined to be <br />nonsignificant by a qualified archeologist, avoidance is not necessary. If <br />the deposits are determined to be significant by the qualified <br />archeologist, the resources shall be avoided if feasible. If avoidance is <br />not feasible, project impacts shall be mitigated in accordance with the <br />recommendations of the qualified archaeologist, in coordination with the <br />City Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Department and <br />CEQA Guidelines Section15126.4 (b)(3)(C), which requires <br />implementation of a data recovery plan. <br />c. The data recovery plan shall include provisions for adequately <br />recovering all scientifically consequential information from and about <br />any discovered archeological materials and include recommendations <br />for the treatment of these resources. In-place preservation of the <br />archeological resource is the preferred manner of mitigating potential <br />impacts, as it maintains the relationship between the resource and the <br />archeological context. In place preservation also reduces the potential <br />for conflicts with the religious or cultural values of groups associated <br />with the resource. Other mitigation options include, but are not limited <br />to, the full or partial removal and curation of the resource. <br />d. The City Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Department <br />shall confirm that the project applicant(s) have retained a qualified <br />archeologist for the preparation and implementation of the data recovery <br />plan, which shall be conducted by prior to any additional earth -moving <br />activities in the area of the resource. The recovery plan shall be <br />submitted to the project applicant, the City Planning, Housing, and <br />Economic Development Department, and the NWIC. Once the recovery <br />plan is reviewed and approved by the City Planning, Housing, and <br />Economic Development Department and any appropriate resource <br />recovery completed, project construction activity within the area of the <br />find may resume. A data recovery plan shall not be required for <br />resources that have been deemed by the NWIC as adequately recorded <br />and recovered by studies already completed. (General Plan Mitigation <br />Measure 4.5-1 a) [SDR][PLANNING] <br />62. Training for Cultural Resources — Prior to the issuance of grading permits within <br />the plan area, the City Planning, Housing, and Economic Development Department <br />shall confirm that any development applicant has required all construction crews to <br />undergo adequate training for the identification of federal or state -eligible cultural <br />resources, and that the construction crews are aware of the potential for previously <br />undiscovered archaeological resources within the plan area, of the laws protecting <br />these resources and associated penalties, and of the procedures to follow should <br />they discover cultural resources during project related work. To the extent that <br />individual development projects are found to have the potential to disturb or destroy <br />archaeological resources, subsequent environmental documentation may be <br />required, including mitigation measures to address any identified significant impacts. <br />Page 23 of 26 <br />ATTY/RESO.0098/PC RESO 910 WOODSIDE ROAD <br />REV: 10-09-19 PR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.