Laserfiche WebLink
7C <br /> Page 215 <br /> Commissioner Seybert asked what amount of Baylands the applicant will be required to <br /> restore based on how much wiil be filled. <br /> Mr. Powers repfied that in regards to the Parkland Standard that was adapted recentfy <br /> by the City Council was 1 '/z acres per 9,000 people. in addition to that they specifically <br /> adopted different populatian densities depending on the housing type. For the <br /> applicant's housing type they adopted 1.87 as a typical number af people that would <br /> occupy a given home. <br /> 796 x 1.87 = 1,488 people divided by 1,400 x 1 '/ acres =2.23 cres. <br /> The applicant wouid be rneeting the Park Standard by 10 �at 2. � acres. They wouEd <br /> be rr�e#�ny it by 200°/a v�ith 4.46 acres. They are pra '� in the communi�y park on <br /> Bair Island and in the two overlook parks at the entra to arinas 2.79 acres. The <br /> outer esplanade will more than meet the criteria of th ark St d and is in excess of <br /> what they would n�ed to get to the 4.6. The ' a :s doin % of the adapted <br /> Park Standard. �-�w` <br /> �.. <br /> Regarding the proposed marina fil(: the � marin '�' 14.1 acres a �proposed <br /> marina and flushing channe! is 5.38 acres in net �II of 8. acres. The <br /> applicant wil{ likely, under the no net loss rule e Federal Statute, require 30-45 <br /> acres. There are two differen aptions where th n acquire this land: those are <br /> typically called uplands and out e 30-45 acres ' lands they would be required <br /> to create approximately 17 acres s in order to the filling of their private <br /> marina. What is lost is about 8.6 es ' ate marin asin and what is gained is <br /> 30-45 acres of private (and that gets nve lic nership on which 17 acres of <br /> new wetlands will b ated and wit o e pe ax payer expense. It wiU be at <br /> the develaper's� •.�::;; �' <br /> ��w <br /> PUBUC H � ,��, <br /> Keith Kadera, R '° od '`�` ,.resident andy� siness awner, believes that the project is <br /> +r��R. <br /> good fiar residents� ," , , se who commute and work in Redwood City <br /> and. � ° �" � e Pia Com �r �"' y o recommsnd this to the Ci#y Counc'sl. <br /> � :�. <br /> �,�. <br /> tie Bond, co �'ty me ,�elmont, is in support of the project. <br /> Je � oenstsin s±a �tthat i makes sense ta put in haus�e�g and not affice and hopes <br /> this i oes forwar . <br /> Frank Ba � � , Re�ood City resident, is in support of the project because it is an <br /> improvemen �ite and good fior the community. <br /> Mike Kastrop��Ftedwood City resident and Archifect, would like this project to move <br /> forward. <br /> Keith Bautista, Redwood City resident and Architec#, sta#ed that Peninsu4a Park is in a <br /> great location and is increased access ta bay waters and increases the support of the <br /> downtown area. The project is well designed structures and is inviting. <br /> Andy Frisch, Redwood City resident, stated that housing is needed in the Redwood City <br /> development plan. <br /> Paga 5 of 10 <br />