Laserfiche WebLink
7C <br /> Page 217 <br /> Steve Raney gave a powerpoint presentafion regarding Redwood City Cool Cities Effort <br /> and Traffic Reduction (TRH). <br /> Shawn White, Redwood City resident, stated that there is not a whofe fot o# public <br /> access to the bay trai(. The downtown needs parks and a new access under highway <br /> 103. He is in suppart of the project. <br /> M/S {Seybert/Gee)to close the Public Hearing <br /> Mofion Passed <br /> COMMtSSIONER COMMENTS '}� <br /> Cammissianer Codding referred to the EIR and the Biolo ' I Res` �rces (s�ction 8-1}. <br /> He statec# that in the original ElR, that was used as ba � nd, 8-1 impact mitigations <br /> are al! related to minimizing the construction impact h nothing said about the <br /> 796 or 1400 resident tha#are going to live in this pr.oj . fn th inal EIR (section 8-8) <br /> regarding project relating bird colfisions there ar in facto : bird collision: the <br /> lighting of structures at night and the prese of wmdows, whic in fiight either <br /> cannot detect ar misinterpret. If this proje oes forw,rd the City sho nd of the <br /> developer, a Iot of attention trying to r 'rd colli ' ns on the hig buildings. <br /> Regarding traffc there will be two ways to ge nd this project, ne will be the <br /> tum narth ta Whipple Avenue, the other wi!! be t south and go across the bridge at <br /> Blamquist and Maple or onto S ort industrial B rd. He believes there will be a <br /> lot of trafFc once the project is d ed. <br /> Commissianer Gee (presented Co is staff with camments on paper}. He <br /> believes that the Precise Plan doe gre � ; alk' about the character of any <br /> proposed developm on the prope . e do want a hardship created with <br /> homeowner ass at are gain be absor- nt on fihe other end. In regards to <br /> mitigations th re opti or B or C d he would like to see that these mi#igations <br /> are equal o rable t ne another. asked what the decision making process is <br /> regarding which� �s el and who de � s and approves whether it is A or B or C. <br /> This development ,. ,� , a period of time and it would be good to <br /> pro� whe e o� �` _ " igations occurs. <br /> � ' <br /> mmissioner � ns s t what is currently zoned to go out on the site is <br /> erciai. How work can go aut on that site. <br /> Mr. repfied th he maximum ailowable square footage on the property, if you <br /> consid � he 19.1 � cres of land that is currently out there, woufd allow for 584,000 <br /> square fe ret ' �development. The worker amount deperds on wt�at type of <br /> business go ere. <br /> ��,,_ <br /> Commissione�orgens asked if the commercia! site would be open to the pub[ic. <br /> Mr. Lyon repliec! that there is still some discussion as to the Parkland Standard, but is <br /> certainly not complete with the amenities that you would see art the proposed project. <br /> 580,000 square feet wouEd be about 180� people for an o�ce component. <br /> Commissioner Seybert asked if the addendum is part of the adopted Fina! <br /> Environmenta} Impact Report that was adopted in July 8, 2003. <br /> M�-. Lyon repliad that the EIR for the Marina Shores Village was certified and looking at <br /> the CEQA standards it states that the lead agency has to prepare that and the Planning <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br />