My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res07 14829
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Res07 14829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2007 8:30:53 AM
Creation date
12/20/2007 8:24:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
12/17/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12/17/2007 <br /> <br />and LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The addition of project traffic is <br />expected to increase the average delay at the intersection by 3.8 and 5.7 seconds during the <br />AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The PM average delay of over 5.0 seconds would <br />represent a significant cumulative impact. <br /> <br />Mitigation 7-15: An improvement has been identified for this location in the <br />Redwood City Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Study (TIMFS). The identified improvement <br />includes the addition of a "free" westbound right-turn lane (Le., a right turn lane that would not <br />be controlled by the traffic signal) and associated receiving lane. However, the level of service <br />analysis conducted for this Addendum indicates that this improvement would not provide <br />acceptable operations during the AM or PM peak hour under either the Cumulative (2020) <br />Without Project or Cumulative (2020) With Project scenarios. <br /> <br />Therefore, implementation of either one of the following two alternative mitigation <br />approaches would be necessary in order to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level: <br /> <br />1. Grade-Separated Railroad Crossing at Whipple Avenue. The cumulative EIR <br />LOS analysis for this intersection included adjustments to signal timing to <br />account for the nearby CalTrain railroad crossing. Calculations conducted for <br />the intersection under Cumulative (2020) With Project conditions without <br />adjusted signal timings (Le., if the train did not affect the operations at the <br />intersection) indicate that the intersection would operate acceptably during <br />the AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, if the railroad tracks were grade- <br />separated from Whipple Avenue, the intersection would be expected to <br />operate acceptably. However, due to the limited distance between the <br />intersection and the CalTrain railroad tracks, grade separation may not be <br />feasible. It should be noted that the grade separation of this railroad crossing <br />has been identified as an objective in the Redwood City Strateqic General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />2. Widening of the Eastbound Intersection Approach to Achieve Acceptable LOS <br />During Both the AM and PM Peak Hours. For the intersection to operate at <br />an "acceptable" LOS (D or better) under Cumulative (2020) With Project <br />conditions without a railroad grade separation at Whipple Avenue, a <br />dedicated right turn lane, two through lanes, and a dedicated left turn lane <br />would need to be provided on the eastbound approach to the intersection <br />(currently, the eastbound approach is configured with one shared through/left- <br />turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane). In addition, the east-west <br />left turn signal phasing would need to be changed from split (Le., shared with <br />opposing through traffic) to protected (Le., exclusive). With these lane <br />additions and signal phasing modifications, the intersection would be <br />expected to operate acceptably (LOS D) during the AM and PM peak hours <br />under Cumulative (2020) With Project conditions. <br /> <br />Widening the eastbound approach would tend to increase peak eastbound <br />traffic volumes on a residential street and would require careful design to <br />provide enough physical clearance to allow opposing eastbound and <br />westbound left turns to proceed simultaneously. <br /> <br />Findings: Both of the mitigation alternatives discussed above are considered to <br />be infeasible due to right-of-way and physical constraints. Therefore, the addition of project <br /> <br />Alty/Reso/Reso.1772 <br />121707 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />14829 <br />Muff# 613 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.