Laserfiche WebLink
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS <br />FOLLOWS: <br />1. The Planning Commission, having independently heard, considered, and <br />weighed all evidence in the record presented on behalf of all parties and being fully <br />informed of the Project, the Zoning Administrator's decision, and the appeal, finds that <br />the Appellant has not shown, based on evidence in the record, that the Zoning <br />Administrator's decision was made in error, that there was an abuse of discretion by the <br />Zoning Administrator, that the Zoning Administrator's decision was otherwise improper, <br />or that the City's notices, agenda, and appeal procedures were unlawful in any manner. <br />This determination is based, in part, on the Notice of Official Action, the staff report, and <br />attachments prepared for the Planning Commission hearing on the Project and the <br />appeal, each of which is incorporated herein by reference. <br />2 The Planning Commission hereby denies the appeal by Lauren Ralph, and, <br />therefore, the decision of the Zoning Administrator approving the Architectural Permit is <br />upheld. <br />3. In denying the appeal and upholding the Zoning Administrator's decision, <br />the Planning Commission affirms and adopts the findings and conditions of approval <br />adopted by the Zoning Administrator and set forth in the Notice of Official Action dated <br />August 20, 2019. <br />4. In denying the appeal and upholding the Zoning Administrator's approval of <br />the Architectural Permit application, the Planning Commission affirms the determination <br />that the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California <br />Environmental Quality Action per Section 15301(e) Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and 15303 <br />(a) Class 3. <br />5. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption. <br />ATTY/RESO.0104/PC RESO 230 IRIS STREET <br />REV: 11-06-19 PR <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />