Laserfiche WebLink
6.A. - Page 20 of 191 <br />In FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19, the City received $5.6 million and $11.0 million, respectively. FY 2018-19 revenue <br />was much higher than estimated due to a one-time acceleration in the timing of payments. This level of funding is <br />higher than can be expected in the future due to the accelerated timing of payments, and recent and potential <br />changes in school financing, which the County Controller has indicated could significantly reduce this revenue <br />source in future fiscal years. The City's policy is to budget what can reasonably be estimated, which was $4.0 <br />million, or about 36 percent of the FY 2018-19 actual amount received. The City has budgeted to receive $4.2 <br />million in FY 2019-20. <br />Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency <br />As of July 1, 2018, the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of Redwood City <br />was reorganized and combined with other oversight boards in San Mateo County, thus creating one Countywide <br />Oversight Board. Going forward, action on behalf of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of <br />Redwood City will be taken by the San Mateo County Countywide Oversight Board. <br />The City continues to focus on the disposition of the $10.3 million in funds that had been in the former <br />Redevelopment Agency's possession, which were encumbered for below-market rate housing through an <br />agreement with the Legal Aid Society. The control of these funds has been in dispute with the State of California <br />Department of Finance (DOF) since the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved in FY 2011-12. The City filed suit <br />against the State of California challenging the DOF's position that these funds are unencumbered and must be <br />remitted to the County Controller. Although the State prevailed in the Superior Court trial, the City has filed an <br />appeal. The appeal is fully briefed and the City has been awaiting a court date since 2015. <br />In the meantime, new State legislation (SB107) was passed in September 2015 requiring that all obligations <br />determined by the DOF be paid in order for successor agencies to receive the benefits of a finding of completion. <br />The City remitted the funds prior to the end of calendar year 2015 for distribution to the taxing entities while it <br />continues to pursue its appeal. The City advised the taxing entities to hold the funds in case the City prevails in this <br />appeal. <br />The City also continues to work with the State of California regarding the disposition of several former <br />Redevelopment Agency land parcels. <br />Relevant Financial Policies <br />In FY 2016-17, the City Council updated the General Fund reserve policy, where the unreserved portion of the <br />General Fund's fund balance shall be 15 percent of anticipated General Fund revenues. With the FY 2019-20 <br />Adopted Budget, the City Council approved a strategy to utilize 80 percent of the excess balance, above the 15 <br />percent reserve threshold, to pay down the City's unfunded liabilities, including pension and retiree health <br />liabilities, and 20 percent as one-time funding towards the City Council's priorities in the areas of housing, <br />transportation, and children and youth. <br />The excess balance is reported under the category "Unassigned Fund Balances." In recent fiscal years, the City has <br />used balances in excess of the reserve policy to pay down unfunded liabilities, contribute to a Section 115 Pension <br />Trust Account for pension liabilities, and for one-time funding towards City Council priorities. <br />The City Council has adopted a Debt Disclosure Policy and Investment Policy. The City reviews these policies <br />regularly and uses them to maintain sound fiscal practices. The City has also established cash management, <br />accounting, budgetary, and risk management policies and practices that are essential to the City's long-term fiscal <br />health. These financial policies and practices also promote public confidence and increase the City's credibility for <br />bond rating agencies and potential investors. Such policies also provide the resources to react to financial needs in <br />a prudent manner. <br />vi 27 <br />