My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:17:00 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 1:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/16/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
866
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.D. - Page 38 of 126 <br />City of Redwood City <br />Mixed -Use Live/Work and Emergency Shelter Zoning Amendment Project <br />Impact 4.1-8: Development allowed by the General Plan could Less than <br />increase building heights in Public Facilities, Schools, and significant with <br />Neighborhood Commercial areas adjacent to Low Density and mitigation <br />Medium Density residential areas, and introduce new shadow <br />effects in shadow -sensitive areas that could substantially alter <br />the existing visual character of those areas. <br />The proposed project would increase density and intensity of <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />development within the MULW district, which would result in <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />increased building heights above existing allowable limits. This <br />proposed project would <br />could result in increased shadow effects on adjacent parcels. <br />result in less than significant <br />However, the General Plan EIR contains a mitigation measure for <br />impacts to existing visual <br />the Downtown district with performance standards designed to <br />character and quality. No <br />ensure that less than 50 percent of a shadow -sensitive public use <br />new or more severe <br />is shaded at noon on the Spring Equinox (March 20). Roselli Mini- <br />impacts would occur. <br />Park is the closest shadow -sensitive use to an area zoned MULW. <br />Impacts would be within <br />The maximum building height allowed under the proposed <br />the scope of those <br />zoning amendment would be 60 feet. At noon on the Spring <br />identified in the General <br />Equinox in Redwood City, a shadow cast by a 60 -foot building <br />Plan EIR. <br />would be less than 60 -feet long, and therefore would not shade <br />Roselli Mini -Park, located over 200 feet from an area zoned <br />MULW. <br />Other outdoor shadow -sensitive uses in the MULW zones would <br />not be affected by the proposed zoning amendment, as the <br />current zoning district allows buildings up to 40 feet high. As an <br />outdoor use in the MULW zone could be affected by a 40 -foot <br />building under existing zoning, a 60 -foot building would not <br />create a substantially greater impact. <br />Impact 4.1-9: The increased density and intensity of urban <br />Less than The proposed project would increase density and intensity of <br />The proposed project would <br />development allowed in the plan area could introduce new <br />significant with development in the MULW district, which would result in greater <br />result in less than significant <br />sources of light and glare, specifically within Downtown, the <br />mitigation exterior and interior lighting associated with the upper floors <br />impacts from new sources <br />Bayfront, and surrounding neighborhoods. <br />compared to the 40 -foot -tall buildings currently allowed under <br />of light and glare. No new <br />the existing zoning ordinance. Lighting requirements included in <br />or more severe impacts <br />the Comprehensive 2013 Zoning Ordinance Amendment and <br />would occur. Impacts would <br />analyzed by the 2013 Addendum to the Final EIR would not be <br />be within the scope of <br />changed under the proposed project. <br />those identified in the <br />General Plan EIR. <br />22 <br />639 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.