Laserfiche WebLink
7.D. - Page 44 of 126 <br />City of Redwood City <br />Mixed -Use Live/Work and Emergency Shelter Zoning Amendment Project <br />Geology and Soils <br />Impact 4.6-1: The plan area is subject to a number of potential Less than <br />seismic hazards, including ground shaking, landslides, significant with <br />liquefaction, and lateral spreading that would affect future mitigation <br />development allowed under the General Plan. <br />Impact 4.6-2: The plan area is subject to a number of geologic Less than <br />and soils -related hazards, including soil erosion, expansive soils, significant <br />slope stability, differential settlement, and subsidence that <br />would affect future development allowed under the General <br />Plan. <br />Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />Impact 4.7-1: Development allowed by General Plan would Less than <br />allow for the use, storage, generation, and disposal of significant <br />hazardous materials, which could lead to the unauthorized <br />release of hazardous materials or exposure of sensitive <br />receptors to harmful emissions. <br />28 <br />The Final EIR analyzed the impacts of future development <br />The proposed project would <br />allowed under the General Plan with regard to a number of <br />result in less than significant <br />potential seismic hazards, including ground shaking, landslides, <br />impacts from seismic or <br />liquefaction, and lateral spreading. Because Redwood City is <br />geologic hazards. No new or <br />located in a seismically active region, population growth and an <br />more severe impacts would <br />increase in the amount of residential and commercial <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />development in the plan area would result in additional people <br />within the scope of those <br />and structures being exposed to seismic risks and related <br />identified in the General <br />hazards, such as liquefaction and slope instability. However, <br />Plan EIR. <br />compliance with General Plan policies, implementing programs <br />those identified in the <br />and other regulatory programs were found to reduce potential <br />General Plan EIR. <br />impacts associated with development under the General Plan by <br />ensuring that future development projects are appropriately <br />investigated in terms of potential seismic hazards and that any <br />new buildings and structures are constructed to withstand the <br />anticipated range of seismic events. The Final EIR also includes a <br />mitigation measure to limit development where threats from <br />seismic hazards cannot be mitigated; this mitigation measure <br />would continue to apply to the proposed project. The proposed <br />project would not exacerbate seismic or geologic hazards, and <br />projects facilitated by the proposed zoning amendment would be <br />constructed in compliance with applicable building codes. <br />Ev- <br />The proposed project would increase density and intensity of <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />development in the MULW district. Allowed uses in these <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />districts include commercial, residential and mixed -uses which <br />proposed project would <br />are not typically associated with use, storage, generation or <br />result in less than significant <br />disposal of hazardous materials. Thus, changes to the <br />impacts from hazardous <br />development standards allowed under the proposed project <br />materials releases. No new <br />would not include an increase in allowed development of uses <br />or more severe impacts <br />typically associated with use, storage, generation, and disposal of <br />would occur. Impacts would <br />hazardous materials, which could lead to the unauthorized <br />be within the scope of <br />release of hazardous materials or exposure of sensitive receptors <br />those identified in the <br />to harmful emissions. <br />General Plan EIR. <br />645 <br />