AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.D. - Page 45 of 126 Impact 4.7-2: Adoption of the General Plan would allow the Less than redevelopment of sites with known or unknown soil and/or significant groundwater contamination and/or buildings containing asbestos or lead-based paint, which could expose construction workers and/or the public to these hazardous materials. Impact 4.7-3: Adoption of the General Plan would allow for new Less than development within an area covered by an adopted airport land significant use plan. Impact 4.7-4: Adoption of the General Plan would allow for new Less than development and an increase in population and housing, which significant could introduce additional traffic and potentially impact emergency response and evacuation planning. Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report The proposed project would not involve changes in proposed land uses, nor would it allow development on properties not already analyzed in the Final EIR. General Plan Implementation programs address potential risks associated with hazardous materials, including Program PS -48, which requires a Phase I site assessments for commercial and industrial properties being redeveloped. The proposed project would not result in any new impacts beyond those already analyzed. The proposed project would increase maximum allowable building height in the MULW zoning district. Of the 30 total blocks zoned MULW, five blocks are located in Area B of the San Carlos Airport Influence Zone (County of San Mateo 2004). Increased allowable building height on these blocks could result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. However, based on the assumptions stated above, any local land use policy changes, such as the proposed project, would be reviewed by the San Mateo County Airport Land Use Commission prior to approval. Additionally, the project would not involve revisions to General Plan policies and implementation programs related to aviation safety. Buildout of the proposed project could increase population to 1,269 residents above the population growth anticipated to occur by the year 2030, as described in the General Plan EIR. Implementation of the proposed project could generate additional traffic and carbon monoxide emissions. However, the population increase would represent a 1.4 percent increase over the anticipated future (2030) population estimates (1.4 percent). The proposed project would not alter existing General Plan policies and programs related to emergency response plans or transportation infrastructure. Growth associated with the proposed project would represent only minor increase in the population above existing general plan population projections and the proposed project would not alter existing policies related to emergency response and evacuation plans. Environmental Analysis Similar to the conclusions in the General Plan EIR, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts from contaminated soil or groundwater, or from demolition. No new or more severe impacts would occur. Impacts would be within the scope of those identified in the General Plan EIR. Similar to the conclusions in the General Plan EIR, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to adopted airport land use plans. No new or more severe impacts would occur. Impacts would be within the scope of those identified in the General Plan EIR. Similar to the conclusions in the General Plan EIR, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to emergency response services and evacuation planning. No new or more severe impacts would occur. Impacts would be within the scope of those identified in the General Plan EIR. 29 646