Laserfiche WebLink
7.D. - Page 52 of 126 <br />City of Redwood City <br />Mixed -Use Live/Work and Emergency Shelter Zoning Amendment Project <br />Impact 4.12-2: The General Plan allows for development that Less than <br />could increase the demand for police services in the plan area. significant <br />This increase could require additional staffing or expanded <br />facilities over time to meet the increased demands. <br />Impact 4.12-3: The General Plan allows for development that Less than <br />could increase the demand for schools and child care centers in significant <br />the plan area. This increase could require additional staffing or <br />expanded facilities over time to meet the increased demands. <br />36 <br />The proposed project would increase the demand for police <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />protection services that could require additional staff or <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />expanded facilities. However, the project would result in a 1.4 <br />proposed project would <br />percent increase in population compared to that previously <br />result in less than significant <br />analyzed in the Final EIR. This would not represent a substantial <br />impacts to police services. <br />population increase and would not result in additional impacts <br />No new or more severe <br />not previously analyzed. As stated in the General Plan EIR, <br />impacts would occur. <br />service levels, new procedures, and response time performance <br />Impacts would be within <br />will be monitored as new development is established in the City, <br />the scope of those <br />and recommendations will be made when necessary. If any <br />identified in the General <br />specific new or expanded police facilities are proposed, such <br />Plan EIR. <br />construction and/or expansion would be subject to CEQA. <br />Environmental documentation prepared pursuant to CECA would <br />identify potentially significant impacts and appropriate <br />mitigation measures. <br />The proposed project would increase the demand for schools <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />and childcare centers that could require additional staff or <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />expanded facilities. However, the project would result in a 1.4 <br />proposed project would <br />percent increase in population compared to that previously <br />result in less than significant <br />analyzed in the Final EIR. This would not represent a substantial <br />impacts to schools. No new <br />population increase and would not result in additional impacts <br />or more severe impacts <br />not previously analyzed. As stated in the General Plan EIR, new <br />would occur. Impacts would <br />development within the plan area would continue to be subject <br />be within the scope of <br />to the requirements of SB 50 to contribute fair share school <br />those identified in the <br />impact fees. These fees would be considered full and complete <br />General Plan EIR. <br />mitigation for any impacts to school facilities. With continued <br />adherence to SB 50, the project would not result in any <br />significant impacts related to schools. <br />653 <br />