AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7.D. - Page 53 of 126 Impact 4.12-4: The General Plan allows for development that Less than could increase the demand for libraries in the plan area. This significant increase could require additional staffing or expanded facilities over time to meet the increased demands. Recreation Impact 4.13-1: Adoption of the General Plan would not increase Less than the amount of active parkland in the plan area. Although the significant City does not currently meet its park standard, the additional demands on existing parkland from the increased population allowed by adoption of the General Plan would not cause a substantial physical deterioration of existing facilities. Impact 4.13-2: Adoption of the General Plan and its associated land use map would not provide any new parks and recreation areas within the plan area. While the General Plan policies and programs do not preclude the ultimate development of new parks and recreation areas, in the absence of any new lands or any park projects within the General Plan, the consideration of impacts from construction or expansion of recreation facilities would be speculative. Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental Analysis The proposed project would increase the demand for public Similar to the conclusions in facilities, such as libraries, that could require additional or the General Plan EIR, the expanded facilities. However, the project would result in a 1.4 proposed project would percent increase in population compared to that analyzed in the result in less than significant Final EIR, which would not represent a substantial population impacts to libraries. No new increase and would not result in additional impacts not or more severe impacts previously analyzed. If specific new or expanded public facilities would occur. Impacts would are proposed, such construction and/or expansion would be be within the scope of subject to CEQA. Environmental documentation prepared those identified in the pursuant to CECtA would identify potentially significant impacts General Plan EIR. and appropriate mitigation measures. Furthermore, the proposed project does not include changes to the existing General Plan policies and implementation programs reducing impacts associated with funding or provision of library facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. The proposed project would increase the maximum number of Similar to the conclusions in dwelling units in the MULW district from 450 to 900, which could the General Plan EIR, the increase the population above those anticipated in the Final EIR proposed project would for the year 2030. This increase in population would increase result in less than significant demand for parkland in the plan area. However, the population impacts to parks. No new or growth anticipated under the proposed project represents a 1.4 more severe impacts would percent increase over the Final EIR- anticipated future occur. Impacts would be population, which would not represent a substantial population within the scope of those increase and would not result in additional impacts not identified in the General previously analyzed. Furthermore, no changes to existing General Plan EIR. Plan policies relating to the parkland are proposed. Less than As discussed in Section 2, Project Description, proposed significant developments could achieve maximum allowable density and intensity only if they provide additional community benefits. These could include new parkland or recreational facilities, construction of which could result in environmental impacts. The proposed project does not involve any individual development projects and future projects would be subject to environmental review under CECtA. The proposed project would not involve any changes to existing General Plan policies related to environmental review of individual development projects or the provision of new parkland or recreational facilities. Similar to the conclusions in the General Plan EIR, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts to recreational facilities. No new or more severe impacts would occur. Impacts would be within the scope of those identified in the General Plan EIR. 37 654