Laserfiche WebLink
7.D. - Page 54 of 126 <br />City of Redwood City <br />Mixed -Use Live/Work and Emergency Shelter Zoning Amendment Project <br />Transportation <br />Impact 4.14-1: New development allowed under the General Significant and <br />Plan could cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in unavoidable <br />relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the roadway <br />system and result in unacceptable service levels on some <br />roadway segments based on current LOS policy. <br />Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. prepared a traffic <br />The proposed project would <br />impact analysis in January 2019 to analyze impacts of the <br />result in significant and <br />proposed zoning amendment (Appendix TRA). The proposed <br />unavoidable impacts to <br />zoning amendment would generate 208 additional AM peak hour <br />roadway segment LOS. No <br />trips and 253 additional PM peak hour trips (Appendix TRA). In <br />new or more severe <br />2030, buildout under the proposed zoning amendment would <br />impacts would occur. <br />not result in degradation of level of service or an increase in <br />Impacts would be within <br />volume of at least 5 percent compared to buildout of the current <br />the scope of those <br />General Plan (Appendix TRA). <br />identified in the General <br />Plan EIR. <br />Impact 4.14-2: Elimination of the LOS standard for roadways Less than <br />Areas affected by the proposed zoning amendment do not <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />within the Downtown would result in potential increases in significant <br />include any areas within the Downtown (Downtown areas are <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />congestion in the Downtown area that could result in LOS E or F <br />designated Mixed Use - Downtown and are covered by the <br />proposed project would <br />operations. <br />Downtown Precise Plan). The proposed project does not propose <br />result in less than significant <br />any changes to policies regarding Downtown. <br />impacts from traffic <br />(east of Brewster), Middlefield Road, Jefferson Avenue, <br />congestion. No new or <br />Broadway, Brewster Avenue, and Farm Hill Boulevard. The <br />more severe impacts would <br />proposed project would not result in any change to the <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />improvements proposed at these locations, nor would it affect <br />within the scope of those <br />the implementation of the identified Final EIR mitigation <br />identified in the General <br />measure that would revise the pedestrian enhanced design <br />Plan EIR. <br />Impact 4.14-3: The reduction of the number and/or width of Less than <br />The General Plan identified specific roadway segments for <br />The proposed project would <br />travel lanes along specified roadway segments ("pedestrian significant with <br />pedestrian enhanced design, which included a reduction in the <br />result in less than significant <br />enhancement design") would result in an unacceptable service mitigation <br />number and/or width of travel lanes. Roadways identified in the <br />impacts from travel lane <br />level at one of the proposed locations. <br />General Plan as potential candidates for pedestrian <br />reduction. No new or more <br />enhancement design include segments of Veterans Boulevard <br />severe impacts would <br />(east of Brewster), Middlefield Road, Jefferson Avenue, <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />Broadway, Brewster Avenue, and Farm Hill Boulevard. The <br />within the scope of those <br />proposed project would not result in any change to the <br />identified in the General <br />improvements proposed at these locations, nor would it affect <br />Plan EIR. <br />the implementation of the identified Final EIR mitigation <br />measure that would revise the pedestrian enhanced design <br />criteria. <br />38 <br />655 <br />