Laserfiche WebLink
7.D. - Page 55 of 126 <br />Impact 4.14-4: Adoption of the General Plan could result in a Less than <br />network of "complete streets" that accommodate multiple significant <br />travel modes and various users appropriate to the surrounding <br />land uses and would not increase hazards due to roadway <br />design features or incompatible uses. <br />Environmental Analysis <br />The General Plan proposes grade separations for rail and vehicle Similar to the conclusions in <br />traffic and U.S. Highway 101/Woodside Road interchange <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />improvements, among other measures, to facilitate complete <br />proposed project would <br />streets. The proposed project would not make any changes to <br />result in less than significant <br />these policies and would not directly affect roadway patterns. <br />impacts from roadway <br />regarding Downtown. <br />design features. No new or <br />land use policies with regard to locations and development <br />more severe impacts would <br />alternative transportation under Circulation/Transportation. <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />impacts to alternative <br />within the scope of those <br />identified in the General <br />Plan EIR. <br />Impact 4.14-5: Adoption of the General Plan would not result in Less than Areas affected by the proposed project do not include any areas <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />potentially inadequate emergency access in the Downtown. significant within the Downtown (Downtown areas are designated Mixed <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />Use - Downtown and are covered by the Downtown Precise <br />proposed project would <br />Plan). The project does not present any changes to policies <br />result in less than significant <br />regarding Downtown. <br />impacts to emergency <br />land use policies with regard to locations and development <br />access. No new or more <br />alternative transportation under Circulation/Transportation. <br />severe impacts would <br />impacts to alternative <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />within the scope of those <br />identified in the General <br />No new or more severe <br />Plan EIR. <br />Impact 4.14-6: Adoption of the General Plan, specifically the Less than <br />The proposed project would not change or conflict with any <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />policies and implementation programs related to the Land Use significant <br />policies and programs in the General Plan related to alternative <br />General Plan EIR, the <br />and Urban Form Chapter of the General Plan, would not conflict <br />transportation. The proposed project implements General Plan <br />proposed project would <br />with the adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting <br />land use policies with regard to locations and development <br />result in less than significant <br />alternative transportation under Circulation/Transportation. <br />densities and intensities for MULW designation. <br />impacts to alternative <br />transportation programs. <br />No new or more severe <br />impacts would occur. <br />Impacts would be within <br />the scope of those <br />identified in the General <br />Plan EIR. <br />Impact 4.14-7: Adoption of the General Plan would promote Beneficial <br />The General Plan seeks to promote walking, bicycling, and transit <br />The proposed project would <br />walking and bicycling within the City, which could complement <br />use within the City by improving pedestrian and bicycle <br />result in beneficial impacts <br />existing facilities and support planned pedestrian and bicycle <br />conditions, increasing pedestrian and bicycle safety, and creating <br />to pedestrian, bicycle, and <br />facilities. <br />a land use context supportive of pedestrian and bicycle travel. <br />transit facilities. No new or <br />Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report <br />39 <br />656 <br />