My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:17:00 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 1:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/16/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
866
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.D. - Page 60 of 126 <br />City of Redwood City <br />Mixed -Use Live/Work and Emergency Shelter Zoning Amendment Project <br />Energy <br />Impact 4.17-1: New growth and development within the plan Less than <br />The proposed project would result in an increase in energy <br />area allowed by the General Plan could result in the use of significant <br />consumption through the construction and operation of taller <br />substantial amounts of electricity and natural gas, but would <br />buildings allowed in the MULW zone. Project construction could <br />not result in wasteful fuel or energy use. <br />require temporary grip power for construction trailers or electric <br />construction equipment, but most energy consumption would be <br />in the form of fuel to operate heavy equipment, light-duty <br />vehicles, machinery, and generators for lighting. <br />Project operation would consume more natural gas and <br />electricity for building heating and power, lighting, and water <br />conveyance, among other operational requirements. The <br />proposed project would allow a higher density during the <br />colocation of residences and employment by increasing the <br />maximum allowable building height, which would locate a <br />greater number of residences nearby existing and future <br />employment. By increasing the density of development, the <br />proposed project would place a greater number of natural gas - <br />and electricity -consuming uses in close proximity to each other, <br />thereby utilizing the initial energy requirement for transporting <br />natural gas and electricity to the end-use destination and <br />reducing overall per capita consumption. <br />Impact 4.17-2: New growth and development allowed by the Less than The proposed project would result in an increase in energy <br />General Plan would increase the demand on natural gas and significant consumption during construction. <br />electricity. Project operation would consume energy in the form of <br />transportation fuel. As discussed in Appendix TRA, the proposed <br />project would result in an additional 2,078 daily vehicle trips; <br />however, the daily VMT per capita would remain lower than the <br />San Francisco Bay Area average daily VMT per capita. <br />Although the proposed project would result in additional daily <br />vehicle trips, the increase would be due mostly to the <br />introduction of more commercial and residential uses in the <br />areas zoned MULW. It does not reflect the efficiency of <br />transportation energy use. Moreover, the introduction of more <br />commercial and residential uses, particularly mixed-use land <br />uses, close to one another further promotes the General Plan's <br />higher -density mixed-use land use pattern that is intended to <br />reduce vehicle trip lengths and subsequent transportation <br />energy use. <br />44 <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />proposed project would <br />result in less than significant <br />impacts from wasteful <br />energy use. No new or <br />more severe impacts would <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />within the scope of those <br />identified in the General <br />Plan EIR. <br />Similar to the conclusions in <br />the General Plan EIR, the <br />proposed project would <br />result in less than significant <br />impacts from increased <br />natural gas and electricity <br />demand. No new or more <br />severe impacts would <br />occur. Impacts would be <br />within the scope of those <br />identified in the General <br />Plan EIR. <br />661 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.