Laserfiche WebLink
CLK-Pamela Aguilar <br />From: Brian Jaffe <brian@voca.vote> <br />Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 4:26 PM <br />To: GRP -City Council <br />Cc: MGR -Alex Khojikian; Nora Grossman <br />Subject: VOCA report in advance of this evening's City Council meeting <br />Attachments: VOCA RWC density tied to benefits.pdf <br />Dear Redwood City City Council Members, <br />My colleague Nora Grossman will be presenting the results of this week's question at tonight's City Council <br />meeting. In an effort to save trees and ink, I'm emailing you a soft copy of the question report that I previously <br />printed out for you. You can also view results on the web at httus://voc.as/rwcl 14. <br />Best regards, <br />Brian Jaffe <br />Complete text of VOCA question <br />Hi, it's Brian from VOCA. This week's question is about residential zoning near downtown. <br />BACKGROUND: Next Monday City Council will consider new zoning for about two dozen blocks near <br />downtown. Proposed zoning would double allowed housing density if developers include community benefits as <br />part ortheir projects. Possible benefits include public open space, public parking, a childcare facility, <br />additional affordable housing, etc. <br />QUESTION: Should increased housing density be tied to developers providing community benefits? <br />A) No, density should be increased without strings attached <br />B) Yes, only increase density if developers pay for city improvements <br />C) No, density should not be increased, regardless of benefits <br />D) Neutral or don't know <br />MORE INFO: Tap htWs://voc.as/cm Mt for details of the city's community benefits program. <br />N=141) <br />Like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter <br />Sign up for VOCA today at htto://voca.vote <br />