AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

R C It seems likejust yesterday we were asked to cut water consumption by 30%. How is water supply going to stretch for all the new housing?? Show me a plan for that before another dog park! The piecemeal approaching planning and development is an embarrassment and an insult to our community. We deserve better. +3 C. NO! Enough is enough already! Traffic is bad enough without adding cramped, more dense housing. Parking would be even more of a nightmare. There just aren't enough lanes on 101 or 280 to accommodate the traffic now and there's not enough law enforcement as it is, so this would be just asking for more trouble. WTH are they thinking?? +3 C. To restate others, Redwood City is already overbuilt for the natural resources. +3 C. To restate others, Redwood City is already overbuilt for the natural resources. +3 C we are already over crowded. How can they provide open space? +2 C - there is already overcrowding and gridlock, and increased housing has only increased the homeless problem. +z C Redwood City is already suffering from high density and overcrowding. The quality of life had taken a huge nose dive because of noise (gardners/leaf blowers/construction) Traffic is incredibly bad especially at rush hour +z C, enough is enough! +Z C! We are already overcrowded! My Neighbors and myself no longer enjoy living in Redwood City! We feel we have been sold and developed to the point we are miserable!! Please stop it's already too late! Please no more density +2 C. We are over max capacity. +t C I do not know why I vote, they counsel continues to develop no matter what. Redwood City has lost its charm !!!!!!! The T. J. are really lovely, theyjust fit in perfectly. Why not worry about real affordable housing, it is a joke!!!!!!!! R C we have enough housing now, we don't need more traffic, and we have plenty of amenities now +t C. Are they serious? Really?