My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-12-16 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:17:00 PM
Creation date
12/13/2019 1:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/16/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
866
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
H C Redwood City is already overcrowded, over built, and heading for a disaster regarding <br />resources(water, utilities, etc.) <br />a C in more and more streets downtown the sun is being blocked. That's not what we moved to PWC <br />for <br />H 3. Stop all building! Unlessyou can build another roadway. No infrastructure to support ANY more <br />development. Im hoping to move out of PWC ASAP. CAnt stand the traffic. And lack of accountability by <br />city planner, city council and developers <br />+D C - I do not trust the council to enforce any meaningful improvements. Too many parking <br />requirements have already been waived. <br />9 c, answers too limited, so no changes to existing neighborhoods without more thought and <br />planning, especially for parking. <br />2 C and if they do increase it parking must be <br />C not enough detail on affected blocks - In any case, fix broken transport infrastructure first. <br />C - we already la k the infrastructure to accommodate those already here. Please do not add more <br />C.. enough is enough <br />C more parks won't replace the neighborhood/community feeling that can come with low density <br />housing. This proposal sounds like a "wolf in sheep's clothing." <br />C, zoning codes are in place for obvious reasons. Developers are aware of those codes well in advance to <br />submitting project proposals. Continuous exceptions for developers result in messy city developments <br />which residents often end up complaining about <br />Just improve infrastructure <br />C. We have too much dev as it is <br />No more. <br />C <br />Too much. Infrastructure isn't keeping up with the amount of housing we already have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.