Laserfiche WebLink
R D) No density should be increased because of a well thought out plan where public transportation <br />around the city is funded, a high open space standard is adhered to, and off street corridors <br />above/below ground are invested in. The other aspects are interesting, and tax revenue from the <br />property pays for at least the delta in costs plus to the city and educational districts and moves forward <br />on ALL not some city priorities for the area. <br />+2 D. not enough information. I need to more about what you are asking the developers to pay for. <br />Developers are already paying fees for schools and improvements. Part of the problem with housing <br />costs are all the time delays and fees that cities and counties are already charging. <br />D not enough info to make an informed decision <br />D. IMO we don't need more high rent housing - period. <br />D <br />I need more info. Density needs to be increased to correct the housing cost issues, but too often <br />developers maximize returns at the expense of the community, so density needs to be increased <br />regardless, but that does not mean developers should get free rein. <br />'Unclear' comments: <br />Thank you I will let her know <br />© 2019 Voca Advocacy Inc, Redwood City, California <br />