My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 188 of 285 2019 Nonresidential New Construction Reach Code Cost Effectiveness Study <br />3.2 Solar Photovoltaics and Battery Measures <br />This section describes the PV and battery measures considered for this analysis. The Reach Code Team <br />estimated the required PV sizes for each building prototype for the efficiency measure packages and the <br />stand alone PV and battery options. <br />3.2.1 Solar Photovoltaics <br />2019 Title 24 requires nonresidential buildings to reserve at least 15 percent of the roof area as a "solar <br />zone," but does not include any requirements or compliance credits for the installation of photovoltaic <br />systems. The Reach Code Team analyzed a range of PV system sizes to determine cost effectiveness. To <br />determine upper end of potential PV system size, the Reach Code Team assumed a PV generation capacity <br />of either <br />♦ 15 W/ft2 covering 50 percent of the roof area, or <br />♦ Enough to nearly offset the annual energy consumption. <br />The medium office and small hotel prototypes had small roof areas compared to their annual electricity <br />demand, thus the PV system capacity at 50 percent of the roof area was less than the estimated annual <br />usage. The medium office and small hotel had a 135 kW and 80 kW array, respectively. The medium retail <br />building has a substantially large roof area that would accommodate a PV array that generates more than <br />the annual electricity load of the building. The PV array for the medium retail building was sized at 110 kW <br />to not exceed the annual electricity consumption of the building when accounting for the minimum <br />annual energy demand across climate zones with efficiency packages. <br />The modeling software for nonresidential buildings does not allow auto -sizing of PV based on a desired <br />percent offset of electricity use. Moreover, the PV size is also constrained by the availability of roof area. <br />Hence, a common size of PV is modeled for all the packages including all electric design. Figure 5 through <br />Figure 7 below demonstrate the percent of electricity offset by PV for both mixed fuel and all electric <br />buildings over their respective federal minimum design package. <br />Figure S. Medium Office - Annual Percent kWh Offset with 135 kW Array <br />100% <br />90% <br />80% <br />70% <br />60% <br />50% <br />40% <br />30% <br />20% <br />10% <br />0% <br />13 <br />Medium Office - Percent kWh Offset by PV <br />111111111111111111111 IHI 111111 <br />1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 <br />Climate Zone <br />■ Mixed -Fuel ■ AII-Electric <br />2019-07-25 <br />440 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.