My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-01-13 Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
1/10/2020 8:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/13/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Rectangle
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
1/10/2020 8:53 AM
Modified:
1/10/2020 8:53 AM
ID:
2
Creator:
Created:
1/10/2020 8:53 AM
Modified:
1/10/2020 8:53 AM
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 59 of 70 <br />Redwood City Broadway Streetcar/Urban Circulator Study <br />Summary Report <br />Ridership <br />A sketch planning process that took into account the existing <br />and planned future land use densities and the number of <br />employees and residents in the Project Study Area was used <br />to estimate ridership. The results were validated by looking <br />at the magnitude of the ridership attracted by other streetcar <br />systems around the country. This validation process resulted <br />in the low- and high-end values shown in Table 1. <br />Table 1: Streetcar Alternatives Ridership Estimate <br />Streetcar Broadway 13 2,200 — 3,900 <br />Direct (1A) <br />Streetcar Broadway- 13 2,200 — 3,900 <br />Marshall Direct (3B) <br />Urban Circulator (8) 18 1,900-3,400 <br />* Ridership estimate range represents low- and high-end values <br />developed in the ridership analysis. <br />Costs <br />The potential capital and operating costs for the program <br />were estimated for the two streetcar alignments and the <br />urban circulator alternative. Table 2 shows the results of this <br />analysis. <br />Table 2: Streetcar Alternatives Cost Estimate <br />Streetcar Broadway E-$152.5 $1.9 <br />Direct (1A) N-$156.2 <br />Streetcar Broadway- E-$158.5 $1.9 <br />Marshall Direct (3B) N-$155.9 <br />Urban Circulator (8) $14.0-$22.0** $1.2 <br />* Cost range relates to whether the terminus is at the existing Transit <br />Center (E) or a new Transit Center (N) north of Broadway. <br />** Cost range relates to the number and quality of the transit stops <br />provided. <br />The capital and operating costs would be similar for the two <br />streetcar alignments but would be much lower for the urban <br />circulator alternative. <br />Alternatives Comparison <br />Figure 11 provides a summary comparison of the three final <br />alternatives. Overall their performance was relatively <br />similar, with the exception that the urban circulator would <br />be significantly less costly but would also likely have lower <br />ridership than a streetcar. <br />The streetcar/urban circulator will attract new transit riders <br />and increase transit use by others resulting in reduced <br />vehicle miles of travel (VMT). Ridership is estimated at 2,200 <br />Smith <br />602 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.