Laserfiche WebLink
FIF;7 -a iC7 <br />LE�1%0-1 <br />City Services: Resident Priorities research <br />All of the items tested are considered priorities to a majority of residents. The availability of affordable housing and overall <br />safety of the City rise to the top, with more than two thirds saying those should be a very high priority for the City. <br />■ Very Somewhat Don't ■ Nottoo ■ Not a Total Total not Net <br />high of a know much of priority <br />priority priority a priority at all rip orit]( priori priority <br />Availability of affordable housing 88% 11% +77 <br />Overall safety of the city , 90% 9% +82 <br />Properly managing City finances 9 7% 89% 4% +85 <br />Reducingtraffic 1%8% 89% 11% +78 <br />Addressing homelessness 3% 2%7% 90% 9% +81 <br />Emergency preparedness % L2&i 90% 8% +82 <br />Limiting negative impacts on the environment 111111111111114111 88% 9% +78 <br />Communication between the City and residents 9 i ' 86% 12% +74 <br />Providing access to affordable childcare options 13% 71% 16% +55 <br />Providing programs and activities for children andteens 1'. 10% 78% 12% +67 <br />Improving public transportation 4%� 80% 16% +63 <br />Providing parking options :' 2% � 78% 20% +59 <br />Addressing illegal dumping 9% 17% M 70% 21% +49 <br />Public libraries and library services 5% 15% 0 74% 21% +53 <br />Park and recreation programs 4960�ii 78% 18% +60 <br />Q52 -Q66. I'd like to read you a list of possible priorities for Redwood City. Please rate how high of a priority you think each one <br />should be for Redwood City—a very high priority, somewhat of a priority, not too much of a priority, or not a priority at all. <br />Redwood <br />City <br />KW <br />Results of 2019 Community Satisfaction Survey <br />25 of 44 <br />