Laserfiche WebLink
From: <br />Jeremy Smith <br />To: <br />PublicComment <br />Cc: <br />GRP -City Council <br />Subject: <br />4/27 CC Meeting Items 7A and 8A <br />Date: <br />Monday, April 27, 2020 5:51:18 PM <br />First, thank you so much to the incredible work that I assume staff has been putting in to <br />address urgent needs from the community and allow for remote public input and remote <br />governance. Thank you, thank you, thank you. <br />Here are my questions for item 7A: <br />Thank you for laying out the projects for the CIP study. I have questions regarding what <br />causes the Theatre Way closure to cost $400,000. What is wrong with the current closure, it <br />seems to work well from an access perspective with the temporary barricades at Middlefield? <br />Are you considering use of automatic rising bollards or other type of limited access <br />infrastructure? I'm just not sure that should be the city be investing in the closure if the current <br />system is working just fine. I'd rather use the funds to be used for other road closures. If <br />improvements are instead focused on pedestrian and ADA compliant accessibility, for <br />example, regrading the steps to allow for better/safer pedestrian and wheelchair circulation, <br />then it seems more justified. <br />Here is my comment for item 8A: <br />Council. Thank you for your leadership during this crazy and scary time. It is clear that you <br />care about addressing the needs of our city's most vulnerable. The proposed safe streets <br />program seems like a great idea, particularly from the frame of environmental justice. I think <br />we all know how important it is to be able to recreate (alone or with kids) in this time of <br />sheltering in place. Some places in the city feel dangerous to walk around. Sidewalks can be <br />narrow and make physically distancing difficult. Additionally access to parks, where physical <br />distancing is easier, is not equal and especially bad in areas with the densest amount of people. <br />While there is a significant amount of people in the city who are lucky enough to have a car <br />(sometimes multiple cars) and can drive to parks and open spaces to breathe fresh air and clear <br />their head, not everyone is that lucky. The proposed safe streets program helps address this <br />inequity by using low-cost solutions to partially close streets that are not popular <br />thoroughfares. I also think there could be potential cost -savings by using cheaper barricades <br />(think about what's used for block parties) and by using a volunteer labor force (call it the safe <br />streets team) for which I volunteer myself. Thanks for your work on this proposal and let's <br />keep the ideas coming!.. Perhaps a similar effort could be worked on with the Downtown <br />Businesses to allow for more physical distancing that could aid in the recovery process. <br />Sincerely, <br />Jeremy Smith <br />For contact information purposes only, please do not read aloud <br />184 Opal Ave, Redwood City, CA 94062 <br />Cell: (650) 400-2562 <br />