My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-02-11 Clsd and Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-02-11 Clsd and Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2008 4:45:43 PM
Creation date
2/7/2008 4:05:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
2/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7C <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />22. Are the port's fmancial decisions made with citywide perspective-how is this <br />ascertained? <br /> <br />A: Financial decisions made by the Port Commission, as previously mentioned in response <br />to Question 20, routinely involve land use, facility leases, tariffs & charges, investment in <br />infrastructure, and other business matters. These decisions are based on the best possible <br />financial analysis. The Port Commission considers these financial matters, along with <br />other factors related to its duties and responsibilities, in making its decisions. For <br />example, in considering the type of project that may be developed on Port property, in <br />addition to the revenue generated by the prospective tenant, the Port Commission <br />considers environmental impacts, traffic, safety/security, wharf utilization, diversity of <br />cargo, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. In consideration of these and other <br />factors in its financial decision making, the Port Commission takes into account a <br />citywide perspective. <br /> <br />23. The powers of the port are far reaching - "complete and exclusive power" for and <br />on behalf of the city (47f) - but there is no process for determining what is on behalf <br />of the city. <br /> <br />A: This statement does not reflect the fact that the "complete and exclusive power" granted <br />the Port Commission is limited to those matters specified under Section 47f. In other <br />words, the Port Commission is given the power to mange the Port for the City based on <br />the terms and conditions of the Charter. Along with the powers specified under Section <br />47f, the Port Commission is given "its duty" to carry these out on behalf of the City of <br />Redwood City. The Port Commission takes its duty in this regard very seriously and <br />does its best to make its decisions in the best interest of the public which they serve. <br /> <br />24. Given the current charter guidelines, how can future planning for the port be done <br />with a citywide perspective or understanding the long-term future of the city? <br /> <br />A: See answer to question 26. <br /> <br />25. What are the long-term port goals? Should these goals be made in conjunction with <br />the city's general plan so they work together? <br /> <br />A: See answer to question 26. <br /> <br />26. Should there be an integration of port and city goals, priorities, and consideration of <br />fiscal impacts? <br /> <br />A: Questions #18, #24, #25, and #26 re the Port's Long Tenn Goals, Future Planning, and <br />Relationship to the General Plan, City Goals, and Community Interests <br /> <br />Goal setting and planning conducted by the Port are not done in a vacuum. The Port is a <br />public agency that conducts its business in meetings open to the public and considers <br /> <br />Port of Redwood City Responses 10 City Charter Questions 02105108 <br /> <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.