My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-06-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-06-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 9:41:37 AM
Creation date
6/18/2020 5:21:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
6/22/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
624
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.C. - Page 20 of 29 <br />sale with the objective of clearing title and limiting City responsibility and liability <br />for land which is of no interest or use to City. <br />• Complex Site. There are a number of properties that may be suitable for sale or <br />lease but which require complex transaction and title analysis as well as a project <br />management plan to fully evaluate options for the site. <br />• Development Site. These are properties that in many cases are vacant and are <br />considered marketable because of the development potential. <br />C. PROCESS FOR DISPOSAL PURSUANT TO SALE OR LONG-TERM LEASE <br />In most cases, the sale or long-term lease of City real property will have a similar practical <br />effect: the use of City property by others for an extended period of time. As such, as set forth <br />below, the basic process for the sale or long-term lease of City property will be same. The <br />decision as to whether the City's goals will be better met through sale or long-term lease will be <br />made by the Council on a case-by-case basis and will affect the terms to be included in an RFP <br />or other property disposition mechanism. Key factors to be considered include: <br />• Which option represents the best financial return to the City? <br />• Are the City's fiscal goals at the time best met with one-time proceeds from the <br />sale or from a long-term income stream? For example, if the disposition is <br />directly linked to the funding of another capital project, such as the acquisition <br />or construction of a replacement facility, then sale may make the most sense. <br />• Does the City have a long-term policy, project, program or proprietary interest in <br />how the property is used? In this case, a long-term lease may make the most <br />sense. <br />• Is the property already fully developed, undeveloped or under -developed? If <br />developed, was it intended to be used as leased space? <br />• Are there limiting factors based on how the property was originally acquired, <br />developed or used, such as grant, enterprise fund or donation requirements or <br />conditions, that would favor or require long-term leasing over direct sale? <br />• What is the appropriate lease term? Depending on the circumstances, the <br />Council may enter into a lease for up to 99 years. Terms up to 99 years would be <br />appropriate for leases where the intent, from a use and developer financing <br />ATTY/POLICIES/PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION PROCEDURES FINAL <br />REV: 09-16-13 PT <br />Page 14 of 22 <br />44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.