Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 4 of 12 <br />• Mobility Evaluation — Replace LOS with VMT for CEQA purposes, evaluate site-specific effects of <br />added traffic using vehicular and multimodal LOS analysis, and require developments to <br />implement improvements if LOS standards aren't met, where feasible and appropriate. <br />• LOS standard of D is set for most intersections in the City, except for intersections covered by the <br />County Congestion Management Program (a standard is set individually for each intersection) or <br />in downtown where the standard is E. This reflects the priority placed on mobility for people <br />walking within downtown and the understanding that congestion increases with density. The <br />concentration of housing and jobs near high-quality transit service supports the city's housing, <br />transportation, and climate goals. When these standards aren't met due to the addition of project <br />trips, infrastructure modifications are identified to reach the standard or to improve operations <br />even if the standard cannot be met. Where a modification would conflict with other city policies <br />(such as for pedestrian safety), the City may choose not to implement the change. <br />Miscellaneous Amendments <br />• Identifies the performance measures and prioritization system developed in RWCmoves as the <br />mechanism for selecting projects for funding and implementation. <br />• Identifies multiple new programs that are consistent with General Plan and RWCmoves goals that <br />call for the creation of policies to address Vision Zero, Curbside Management (i.e. deliveries, <br />Uber/Lyft pick-up), On -Demand Transit Service, Automated Vehicle Management, Electric Vehicle <br />Encouragement, and Robot/Drone Delivery. <br />Transportation Analysis Manual <br />As mentioned above, the TAM details required transportation analysis consistent with State law and the <br />Circulation Section of the General Plan Built Environment Element and identifies specific methodologies <br />and significance criteria. This policy document effectively outlines the City's practice for how it will analyze <br />the transportation impacts of development projects and is consistent with how projects have been <br />analyzed in the past. The tools and approaches to VMT analysis, while not new, are being applied in new <br />ways. The practice of VMT analysis will evolve in the coming months and even years. Modifications will <br />need to be made to the TAM to reflect changes in State law, changes to the General Plan, and based on <br />our experience applying VMT analysis to different types of projects and the emergence of new tools and <br />approaches with which to complete the analysis. Acknowledging this, staff recommends delegating <br />authority to the City Manager or her designee (likely the Community Development & Transportation <br />Director) to modify the TAM as needed to be consistent with State law, to be consistent with the General <br />Plan, and/or to make other minor modifications to improve the effectiveness of the TAM in evaluating <br />transportation impacts. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Implementing the proposed General Plan amendments will be done using existing staff resources, the <br />cost of which is in the existing operating budget. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />.aA . <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />83 <br />