Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 13 of 21 <br />3. On-call planning services - At the same meeting, City Council also approved contracts with three <br />professional planning firms to provide on-call assistance for the Gatekeeper projects. The <br />Planning Division anticipates using these on-call services to help process some of these projects. <br />4. Grants - On November 25, 2019 and May 18, 2020, City Council approved resolutions for non- <br />competitive grants (SB2 funds and LEAP grant respectively), totaling $610,000 in financial <br />assistance for long range planning activities that plan for additional housing or accelerate the <br />production of housing. The S132 grant has been awarded and staff awaits response on the LEAP <br />grant, which is anticipated to be awarded in 2021. The City committed to using these funds, if <br />granted, toward the community visioning process for the Central Redwood City Plan and future <br />updates to the Housing Element, following the upcoming cycle 6 of the Regional Housing Needs <br />Allocation (RHNA). While these funds will go towards efforts to increase housing production <br />within the city, these funds will not be used towards processing the Gatekeeper projects <br />5. Sequoia Station Update: On February 24, 2020, City Council considered an initiation for the <br />Sequoia Station project within the Transit District. The Council declined to initiate the project at <br />that time and instead instructed staff to lead a Transit District community engagement process <br />and consider issues of height and jobs -housing balance, as well as other community priorities. <br />Since that time, staff has worked on a community engagement plan, which was temporarily halted <br />due to Covid-19. Community outreach is scheduled to start in October and the applicant has <br />continued to work on project revisions that address concerns with height and housing, and staff <br />has continued technical work. This item is scheduled to return to Council in January 2021. <br />Staff will be able to provide an update on workforce capacity and financial impacts at the anticipated <br />October 12, 2020 City Council meeting when the City Council determines whether to proceed with any of <br />the Gatekeeper projects. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />Projects that move forward under the Gatekeeper process would have to undergo environmental and <br />project review. Structuring multiple environmental review processes will be challenging, as multiple <br />project -specific Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) at one time could be highly complex and inefficient. <br />If General Plan Amendment projects in the DTPP are directed to proceed, staff recommend some options <br />for more efficient CEQA processing. Amendments to the DTPP caps could be considered with a program - <br />level EIR with streamlining options for individual project review and the same development standards as <br />outlined in the existing DTPP. Environmental review under the existing DTPP could likely be completed <br />within 15-18 months from the General Plan initiation date. However, some other key considerations <br />include: <br />• Cost Sharing: It could be difficult to determine a fair share contribution for all of the projects <br />involved in the supplemental EIR analysis. <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />. MMIM . <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />94 <br />