My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-03-24 Clsd and Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-03-24 Clsd and Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2016 3:21:37 PM
Creation date
3/20/2008 3:32:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/24/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />attachment 3 <br /> <br />6.1C <br />Page 31 <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />TO THE HONORAILE <br />MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI. <br /> <br />September 1. 1988 <br /> <br />"OM 1MI CITY MANAOII <br /> <br />INFORMATION ONLY <br /> <br />EXTENSION OF DEVELOPMENT ON LAUREL WAY <br /> <br />This is an information report to recap the history of this subject. inform the <br />Council about recent applications for building permits and staff's intended <br />actions. <br /> <br />Background and Discussion: <br /> <br />In 1970 the City unsuccessfully attempted to have public improvements in <br />Laurel Way installed under an assessment district. (The chronology of the <br />district is in Appendix "A"). Plans and specifications were prepared and a <br />soil and geologic investigation undertaken. They are available as input to an <br />environmental impact report considered necessary by the staff. subject to <br />revisions of the construction documents to current materials and construction <br />standards. The soil and geologic investigation must be updated to provide <br />design and quality control for future development. Staff continues to have <br />major concerns about geologic conditions in this area which may expose people <br />or structures to geologic hazards. <br /> <br />In addition. the plans and specifications prepared in 1970 do not conform to <br />current ordinances. specifically the street width. This leaves two options: <br /> <br />Option 1: Amend the pertinent Ordinance to permit the non-conforming <br />street width. In such case. the Laurel Way right-of-way which <br />was offered for dedication and not accepted on the Subdivision <br />Map. could be accepted by the City. or <br /> <br />Option 2: Condition any further development subject to all owners <br />adjacent to the existing unimproved private -sfreet-~o enter <br />into an agte~ment to maintain the street. <br /> <br />It should be understood that a decision to allow development to proceed on <br />Laurel Way will almost certainly require that variances be given for the <br />construction of each dwelling. The lots are so steep that we can expect that <br />there will be substandard setbacks from the street and building heights <br />exceeding the 3D-foot height limit. In addition, there may be a substantial <br />loss of mature trees and a significant amount of grading. <br /> <br />A prior staff report explaining the development problems is in Appendix liB". <br /> <br />Since that report, the Hatfields have built a house. and provided water and <br />sewer line extensions under a special improvement agreement with the City. <br />This Agreement also required construction of road improvements for one-half of <br />the street width, and specified that the streets shall remain private unless <br />later improved to its full width under assessment or other proceedings. The <br /> <br />, 14 1,,_ I.... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.