My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 8:53:43 AM
Creation date
11/5/2020 6:29:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/9/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayor Diane Howard <br />Honorable City Council of Redwood City <br />November 9, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />contains conclusions and lacks analysis. There is also inadequate discussion of whether this <br />Project, in combination with other projects approved or pending in Redwood City and Menlo <br />Park, will generate enough students that there will no longer be capacity at Sequoia High School. <br />Both the Draft and Final EIR also disregard and/or misconstrue the holding of Chawanakee <br />Unified School District v. City of Madera (2011) 196 Cal.AppAth 1016, which expressly holds <br />that payment of developer fees does not constitute full and complete mitigation for school - <br />related impacts other than school overcrowding. Thus, the City's reliance on Government Code <br />section 65995(h) is misplaced, and the EIR for the Project is required to analyze all 27 school - <br />related impact areas listed in our August 19, 2019, and February 28, 2020, correspondence. <br />These concerns are further fleshed out and analyzed in detail in our prior correspondence related <br />to this Project, all of which is enclosed for your reference. <br />It is our hope, as well as our client's, that the City will slow down this process so that the <br />District's concerns can be addressed. We note that the developer and District have met at least <br />once to discuss the above concerns, but that pandemic -related considerations have prevented <br />further meetings or any resolution. We therefore request that, at a minimum, the City postpone <br />approval of this Project and certification of the EIR until the developer's commitment to work <br />with the District and address its concerns is formally memorialized. Schools are a vital part of <br />the infrastructure of a community that cannot thrive without responsible planning by their local <br />agency partners. The District understands and supports the desire for adequate housing, but there <br />must be a corresponding desire to ensure adequate school capacity to serve the families who will <br />reside in that housing. <br />Sincerely, <br />LOZANO SMITH <br />6 <br />Harold M. Freiman <br />HMF/gc <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Ms. Lindy Chan, Acting Planning Manager (lchan@redwoodcity.org) <br />Crystal Leach, Interim Superintendent (cleach@seq.org) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.