My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 8:53:43 AM
Creation date
11/5/2020 6:29:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/9/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Lindy Chan, Principal Planner <br />City of Redwood City, Planning Services <br />October 27, 2020 <br />Page 8 <br />VI. Inadequate Mitigation Measures <br />Based on the deficiencies of the Draft and Final EIRs described above, the District maintains its <br />position that the lead agency's position that payment of school impact fees will mitigate school <br />impacts to a less than significant level is inaccurate. Since the Draft EIR, as modified by the <br />Final EIR, is lacking in detailed discussion and analysis of existing and projected Project <br />conditions, taking into account both the impact on school facilities and the impacts related to <br />schools, one cannot accurately reach the conclusion that developer fees are adequate to mitigate <br />the Project's school impacts because all impacts have not been evaluated. <br />VII. Conclusion <br />It remains the District's position that the Draft EIR, as modified by the Final EIR, does not <br />adequately analyze the Project's potential impacts related to schools, and mitigation measures <br />that would lessen these impacts. The safety of its students is paramount to the District, and its <br />safety concerns are not adequately addressed in the Draft EIR or Final EIR. Changes must be <br />made to preserve the safety of the children and allow them to enjoy productive time at school, <br />free from excessive traffic, noise, and pollution. For this reason, and in order to allow the <br />District additional time to meet with the Developer, the District requests that any decision by the <br />Planning Commission to recommend certification of the Final EIR to the City Council be <br />postponed. <br />The District is hopeful that collaboration with City and Developer will yield meaningful <br />solutions that alleviate the impacts caused by the Project. District remains prepared to provide <br />information as necessary to assist City and Developer in addressing each of the District's <br />concerns regarding the proposed Project. The District stands ready to continue meeting and <br />working with the City and Developer to address these vital issues. <br />Sincerely, <br />LOZANO SMITH <br />Harold M. Freiman <br />HMF/gc <br />Enclosure <br />cc: Crystal Leach, Interim Superintendent (cleach@seq.org) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.