Laserfiche WebLink
This developer has a history of not being transparent with our community to our <br />detriment. For example, just as their Elan housing development was to open for <br />occupancy last year, it was sold to a non-profit (Stanford). This will result in Redwood <br />City losing millions of dollars in tax revenues over the next thirty years. Was this impact <br />discussed with the City? Was mitigation offered to the Community before completing <br />this transaction? Was this a major developer demonstrating good faith or a preview of <br />further actions to come? <br />Based on published reports and as raised in public comments at last week's Council <br />meeting, the developer reportedly has a record of major unsafe construction practices <br />and poor property management. This raises many questions about their suitability to <br />safely complete and manage this massive project. Nothing in any public record <br />indicates adequate consideration of these shortcomings during the staff and Planning <br />Commission review. <br />Given this developer's track record and size and scope of this project, a comprehensive <br />development agreement should be negotiated specifying the representations and <br />obligations of the Developer on this project. It should also address what happens if the <br />project or parts are sold. For example, how will City tax revenues be secured especially <br />if sold to non -profits? If there are substantial short term windfalls, the City should share <br />in a percentage to address its housing, transportation and other critical needs. <br />3-Housing/Jobs Imbalance and Health Emergencies <br />The Developer has proposed a project which will further significantly aggravate the long <br />term housing crisis. Using the metrics from the Nexus Study conducted in 2015, <br />530,000 sq ft in new office space will generate a demand for over 2,600 housing units. <br />The Developer is only proposing 540 units. This is a deficiency of over 2,000 units! The <br />Nexus study calls for 50% affordable housing. The current project only allows for less <br />than 20% of net new affordable housing. <br />There is nothing close to this level of housing in approved and funded projects in our <br />region. In fact there is nothing in any analysis of this project that attempts to quantify <br />this deficiency or how it is addressed in other approved, pending or proposed new <br />housing projects. Not doing this analysis and setting a plan is a massive shortcoming <br />which will directly relate to accelerating public health and safety emergencies. This fact <br />alone shows you do not have the basis to consider this project for approval at this time. <br />