AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.D. - Page 61 of 179 CITY OF DALY 333 -90TH STREET QALY CITY, CA 94015-1895 PHONE: (E5 50) 991 -8000 August 11, 2016 Honorable Joseph C. Scott Judge of the Superior Court c/o Charlene Kresevich Hall of Justice 400 County Center, 2 d floor Redwood City, CA 94063-1655 Re: Response to Body Worn Cameras -The Reel Truth Dear Judge Scott, CITY We are in receipt of the Grand Jury's final report referenced above. Pursuant to your May 24, 2016, request for response, the Daly City, City Council held a public meeting on August 8, 2016 and approved this response. The City of Daly City responds to the Grand Jury's findings, conclusions and recommendations as follows: FINDINGS: F1. The Atherton, Belmont, Foster City, Hillsborough and Menlo Park Police Departments have deployed body -worn cameras. Response: The City agrees with this finding. F2. The Sheriff's Office and five of the city police departments that have not deployed body - worn cameras all expressed similar concerns regarding the implementation of these systems, the cost of equipment, the cost of data retention, and policy development. Response: The City partially disagrees with this finding. The City of Daly City has not deployed body -worn cameras and is concerned with the implementation, cost, data retention and policy development. The City of Daly City and the Daly City Police Department do not have enough information to agree with the finding as it relates to the concerns of the other agencies in San Mateo County. F3. The Atherton, Belmont, Foster City, Hillsborough, and Menlo Park Police Departments have budgeted sufficient funds to manage the cost of equipment, data retention, and training. Response: The City partially disagrees with this finding. While the City of Daly City agrees the above mentioned cities have body -worn camera systems, we are not familiar with their budgeting practices and cannot agree without further data. 100