Laserfiche WebLink
6.D. - Page 81 of 179 <br />require and will seek to secure funding from grants or other <br />competing programs. Additionally, it would be ideal to pair this <br />purchase with other technological integrations with records <br />management software enhancements needed for response to <br />California Public Records Act Requests (CPRA). As a result, the City <br />cannot commit to fully implementing a body -worn camera system by <br />October 31, 2097." <br />Based on this direction, the Redwood City Police Department developed an <br />implementation plan for body -worn cameras (BWC). The plan is designed to inform City <br />decision makers and members of the public on the benefits, shortcomings, costs, and <br />implementation timelines associated with deploying a BWC system for sworn and non - <br />sworn personnel engaged in the enforcement of laws and codes within the city. <br />Documenting police interactions and enforcement activity is not something new. Over <br />the progression of professional police enforcement starting in the 1820's (Sir Robert <br />Peel, Minister of Parliament — United Kingdom) police departments have increasingly <br />been aware of the need to document and account for their enforcement interactions. <br />Early on, written reports were first introduced to enhance verbal only court testimony. <br />Ever since professional law enforcement has made steady attempts to align their <br />operations with methods and technologies that document an accurate and enhanced <br />account of police interactions. The ever evolving capability to capture a more accurate <br />and possibly unbiased rendition of law enforcement interactions has now developed into <br />an expanded array of options for documenting police interactions, and enforcement <br />contacts. Beyond written documentation, progressive law enforcement has <br />incorporated things like radar to document speeds; recorded interview rooms to assure <br />compliance with constitutional safeguards; fixed police facility video in high conflict <br />areas like jail intake and booking areas. Some police vehicles are also enhanced with <br />video cameras to capture forward driver view and prisoner transport seating view. And <br />most recently the advent of body -worn cameras is providing yet another method to <br />document the police interaction during mobile enforcement actions of the individual <br />officer. <br />Unlike other methodologies deployed in the past that have provided enhanced <br />documentation on police interactions, individual body -worn camera systems present a <br />unique set of circumstances when documenting police interactions. Individual privacy <br />rights of the contacted person captured on video, individual freedoms of the working <br />officer in their non -enforcement contacts and daily work activities, and the potential for <br />escalating costs beyond the initial deployment of hardware and data storage, are real <br />issues when considering the use of body -worn cameras. <br />Over the course of the last six -months, our department has convened an internal BWC <br />working committee to analyze industry best practices, cost implications, vendor <br />products, labor-management issues, and policy and procedures associated with the <br />development of a responsible and maintainable BWC system. The results of the <br />committee implementation are highlighted throughout this report. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The proposed BWC implementation plan will attempt to address each of these <br />concerns, and more, as each segment of the deployment plan is analyzed and <br />discussed. The plan is broken out into 15 phases for deployment with each category <br />addressing estimated time for analysis, development, deployment and associated costs; <br />120 <br />