My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 5:27:49 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 6:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/23/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
840
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.D. - Page 52 of 179 <br />Town Response; The Town neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding, but agrees to <br />the extent such information was provided for in the Grand Jury report entitled "Body Cameras <br />— The Reel Truth. "Although the Grand Jury report does not appear to address this finding <br />directly, it alludes to the fact that these police departments have successfully implemented a <br />body -worn camera system. <br />F4. The Atherton, Belmont, Foster City, Hillsborough, and Menlo Park Police Departments <br />have developed written policies regarding the operation and data retention of body -worn <br />camera systems as well as the protection of the rights of the community and police officers. <br />Hillsborough is in the process of developing a similar policy. <br />Town Response: The Town agrees with this finding based on its review of the <br />Grand Jury report entitled "Body Cameras -- The Reel Truth' which contains the written <br />policies for Atherton, Belmont, Foster City, Hillsborough, and Menlo Park Police <br />Departments. <br />F5. Many local law enforcement agencies that currently do not employ body -worn cameras <br />acknowledge that these systems are beneficial and will likely be implemented in the future <br />either voluntarily or by mandate. <br />Town Response, The Town neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding as it was <br />not one of the local law enforcement agencies interviewed for the Grand Jury report <br />entitled "Body Cameras — The Reel Truth. "The Town agrees with this finding to the <br />extent that it believes that body worn cameras can be beneficial. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />R1. The Grand Jury recommends that the councils of those cities/towns that have not <br />adopted body -worn cameras direct their respective chiefs of police to develop an appropriate <br />body -worn camera implementation plan and advise the public of their plan by November 30, <br />2016, <br />Town Response: The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but an <br />implementation plan will be initiated by November 30, 2016, It should be noted that any <br />implementation plan may or may not yet be public by this date. The Town will work <br />with the various policies provided in the Grand Jury report entitled "Body Cameras — The <br />Reel Truth "and will work with the League of California Cities and the California Police <br />Chiefs Association to determine the best body -worn camera policy and plan for the <br />Town. <br />R2. The Grand Jury recommends that the San Mateo County Sheriff develop a plan to <br />implement body -worn cameras and advise the public of this plan by November 30, 2016. <br />Town Response; The recommendation will not be implemented as this <br />recommendation is not applicable to the Town of Colma. <br />R3. The Grand Jury recommends that the police departments of those cities, towns, and the <br />Broadmoor Police Protection District that have not adopted body -worn cameras implement a <br />91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.