My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-04-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2008 3:49:10 PM
Creation date
4/10/2008 3:44:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
4/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />'Senate Budget Committee' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Ontario City Manager Greg Devereaux and League Deputy Executive Director Dwight <br />Stenbakken represented cities. They provided suggestions for improving the fiscal relationship <br />between the state and city government in California. These include: <br /> <br />. Infrastructure Funding: This is a critical area of concern for cities when focusing on the <br />urban development of local communities. Without proper financial tools to support <br />infrastructure for urban development, cities will not be able to properly meet density and <br />transit-oriented development goals under green house gas reduction legis/ation. The <br />following was recommended: <br /> <br />o The two-thirds voting threshold for local government general obligation bonds <br />should be lowered to a majority vote, the same threshold for state general <br />obligation bonds, or, if unachievable, a 55 percent voter approval threshold, the <br />same threshold now in law for school capital bonds; and . <br /> <br />o Lower the two-thirds voting threshold for countywide transportation votes. A <br />number of such county votes have considerable voter support, but fail with voter <br />support in the low 60th percentiles. <br /> <br />. Re-examine the Sales Tax Base: The state and local government tax base for sales <br />taxes should be broadened. The sales tax base has been considerably narrowed over <br />the years with legislatively enacted sales tax exemptions or erosion through decisions <br />made by the Board of Equalization (BOE). As a result, the narrow base makes the sales <br />tax more vulnerable than it has to be and it is a tax that is growing in disparity from the <br />economic realities of a 21 st century economy. Expanding the base of the sales tax would <br />begin to meet these problems. <br /> <br />. Stability Is Key in Any Proposal: Whatever direction that the Committee and ultimately <br />the legislature and Governor take to reformlrebuildlremake the state and local fiscal <br />relationship, stability is a key principle for local government. The stability afforded local <br />governments in Proposition 1A (2004) gives local government the ability to plan public <br />services in a more rational and effective manner. Without this stability, local governments <br />will again be forced to look over their shoulder every time the state budget is in a deficit <br />situation. <br /> <br />. Redevelopment is an Important Financial Tool: The Committee was reminded that <br />redevelopment is one of the more important tools for financing infrastructure, necessary <br />to meet state goars relating to low and moderate income housing as well as transit- <br />oriented development. Without redevelopment, there would have to be a substitute <br />revenue source to address these priority infrastructure issues. <br /> <br />The counties were represented by two county Chief Administrative Officers (CAOs), one current <br />and one retired. They focused on the many state programs run/administered by counties. Behind <br />this discussion is the motivation for the state to explore opportunities for program "realignments. <br />that shift state programs to counties presumably along with the revenue to adequately cover the <br />cost. <br /> <br />While there have been some successes in program realignment in the past, counties are always <br />cautious that realignment proposals don't assign considerable new responsibilities to counties <br />and fall short on proper funding. They also shared a perspective of some county officials that <br />redevelopment agencies in cities negatively impact state and county finance. <br /> <br />Next Step <br /> <br />Sen. Denise Ducheny (D-San Diego), Budget Committee chair, announced that the Committee <br />would like proposals to be submitted before the next full Committee hearing. This hearing is <br />scheduled for Thursday, April 24. The timing will allow Committee members time to vet any <br />proposals and work on any Committee projects before Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's May <br />Budget Revise. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.