My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 11:43:36 AM
Creation date
1/22/2021 5:57:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/25/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: <br />To: <br />GRP -City Council <br />Subject: <br />Sequoia station plan <br />Date: <br />Tuesday, January 26, 2021 10:45:03 AM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when <br />opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. <br />Dear Council, <br />I listened in on last night's council meeting (1/25/21). Thank you for your efforts and <br />willingness to work late into the night. <br />I did not want to add to the long list of speakers and decided instead to submit my <br />input via email. <br />I am a RWC resident and member of the HHCC. <br />I am in the camp that supports the Sequoia Station project but would like to see more <br />housing. I believe the solution is adding height as many speakers pointed out <br />including other members of the HHCC. I have no problem with a 17 story building if <br />necessary but I think just adding a few floors of housing would be beneficial. I am <br />disappointed in my fellow residents answering the survey are against going above the <br />height restrictions. I did not see the survey but I wonder if the question were phased <br />differently we might get a different response. I am not one who thinks the added <br />office space will cause displacement. Displacement happens when we put office <br />space away from transit. Displacement will happen in RWC because as the city <br />becomes more walkable/bikeable and beautiful people will want to live here. You will <br />hear more from me and the HHCC on how to preserve NOAH units in neighborhoods <br />that currently hold most of our low income residents. Protecting and expanding our <br />affordable housing in these neighborhoods is the key to a diverse community. <br />I would like to add for your consideration a walk/bike bridge (or tunnel) over EI <br />Camino at James. Giving residents and specifically students who cross at that <br />intersection a protected path into the new development and the transit center would <br />enhance the project's accessibility, usability and pedestrian safety. <br />Also for your consideration and something that I mentioned (a while ago) to the safe <br />streets committee staff is building a protected bikeway from Downtown to the Bay <br />Trail. The Bay Trail along with the proliferation of eBikes can be another commute <br />transit artery. The bay trail can service commutes to Redwood Shores and beyond to <br />the north and Facebook and Google to the south. I have talked to Google and they <br />were very enthusiastic about utilizing the Bay Trail for commutes. If we can safely <br />connect people between the Trail and the transit center, RWC might become the hub <br />for bike traffic. This traffic also might be a benefit for local business as walking and <br />other "slow traffic" like bikes is more likely to stop at our retailers as they transit <br />Downtown. Such a protected bikeway would also be a great for safe family biking on <br />weekends and such. <br />Thank you again for all your hard work and entertaining these thoughts <br />Elan Scheinman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.