Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Mr. Sailesh Mehra <br /> City of Redwood City <br /> July 2, 2010 <br /> Page 2 <br /> applicant in an effort to resolve this issue. Text changes were made to the DEIR to address this issue, <br /> and included the addition of a new mitigation measure. Mr. Jeffrey Smith spent 32 hours of time on <br /> this task, for an out of scope cost of $4,736. <br /> Task 4 FEIR <br /> Task 4 includes the preparation of the Final EIR (FEIR). RMT is requesting that hours originally <br /> intended for junior staff be transferred to Mr. Jeffrey Smith in order to expedite the completion of the <br /> FEIR. There are a number of reasons for this request, including the extremely short timeline for <br /> completion of the Administrative Final EIR (AFEIR), the need for senior level staff to review and <br /> incorporate the work produced by the M Group into the AFEIR, and the fact that Mr. Smith is the <br /> only member of RMT staff currently fully up to date on the Laurel Way project. The existing <br /> approved scope provides 40 hours for junior staff to prepare the AFEIR, and an additional 20 hours to <br /> prepare the FEIR. RMT requests that these 60 hours be transferred to Mr. Smith. The billing rate for <br /> junior staff is $88 per hour, while the billing rate for Mr. Smith is $148 an hour - a difference of $60 an <br /> hour. The budget augment resulting from this transfer of hours would be $3,600. <br /> Earlier this week, RMT staff was provided with a copy of the approved meeting minutes for the <br /> April 6, 2010 Planning Commission public hearing. RMT staff reviewed these minutes and found that <br /> many of the public comments made at the meeting either were not incorporated into the official <br /> minutes, or were incomplete. The FEIR must include responses to comments made at the public <br /> hearing, and therefore the minutes need to be revised to more accurately reflect the comments made <br /> at the meeting. RMT staff is requesting a budget augment of $1,184 for staff to revise these minutes <br /> and submit the revisions to the Planning Commission for adoption. A separate item under Task 5, <br /> below, includes the cost for attending the July 20, 2010 Planning Commission meeting for the review <br /> and adoption of the revised minutes. <br /> Task 5 Meetings and Communication <br /> Task 5 includes meetings and communication. At City staff request, RMT is requesting a budget <br /> augment to have four technical subconsultants present at the August 17, 2010 Planning Commission <br /> hearing in order to address questions or comments related to their areas of specialty. The specific <br /> subconsultant firms to be present at the meeting and the cost requirements for each are listed below: <br /> FfX ter2 <br />