My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-05-19 Spec
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-05-19 Spec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2008 10:59:57 AM
Creation date
5/15/2008 4:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/19/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />78 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />In sum, if a park is not covered by the initiative, changes to the use of that park <br />would not require two-thirds voter approval. Conversely, if a park is covered, certain <br />changes to the use of that park could require two-thirds voter approval. This is discussed <br />in more detail in the responses that follow. <br /> <br />Attached to this memorandum are a list and map of City parks showing their location <br />and whether each park is covered by the initiative. <br /> <br />2. Would two-thirds voter approval be required to construct a senior center <br />facility in a park that is covered by the initiative? <br /> <br />Although the answer to this question cannot be answered with certainty due to <br />an ambiguity in the initiative, it is likely that building a senior center in a covered park <br />would require two-thirds voter approval. <br /> <br />A City park is covered by the initiative if it has a General Plan designation of "Park" <br />or one of the other designations covered by the initiative. Under the initiative, a covered <br />park could not be used, without two-thirds of the voter approval, for any purpose other than <br />the following: <br /> <br />(a) Agriculture; (b) Extraction of chemicals from sea water by <br />natural evaporation and extraction of oyster shells or other <br />deposits from the San Francisco Bay; (c) Public parks and <br />public recreation areas or facilities; (d) restored wetlands; and <br />(e) uses defined as accessory to the foregoing uses in the <br />applicable zoning district as of March 13, 2008. <br /> <br />The question then is whether a senior center is consistent with any of the above- <br />mentioned uses. The most closely related purpose might be "public parks and public <br />recreation areas or facilities." The initiative, neither defines the phrase nor identifies the <br />permitted uses. Complicating matters, the City's planning documents do not contain a <br />similar phrase that is defined or described in any detail.1 The phrase is therefore <br />ambiguous and may be subject to judicial interpretation if certain uses are proposed <br />under that exception. <br /> <br />A senior center, such as Veterans Memorial Senior Center, is used for a variety of <br />non-recreational uses, such as providing information and resource services, nutrition <br />programs, art and musical events, classes, and rental space for events. Such uses are <br />more consistent with "cultural" activities as described in the Cultural Element of the General <br />Plan and not Open Space activities. Further, the Open Space Element of the General Plan <br />addresses "outdoor recreation" and does not address indoor recreation activities. Thus, <br />while the answer is uncertain and may tum on the type of activities proposed by a new <br />center, two-thirds voter approval would likely be required to build a senior center in a <br />covered park. <br /> <br />1 The phrase is found in the Zoning Code as a permitted use within the "Tidal Plain" zoning <br />district but it is not defined or described. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.