Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.1F <br /> <br />previous year was significantly less than originally expected. The primary reason for Page 2 <br />this shift was that the project team amended its approach to the irrigation site retrofits, <br />and instead of scheduling construction on customer sites ahead of installation of <br />distribution pipelines, the work was pushed back to immediately follow pipelines. This <br />provided more time for acquiring customer applications for service, gain design approval <br />from the State Department of Public Health, and finally to negotiate and receive site <br />entry agreements for each customer site. Since this pre-retrofit work was accomplished <br />by several project team members working together, the average monthly costs for <br />Kennedy/Jenks services were relatively low. However, since Retrofit Bid Package NO.1 <br />was awarded in the spring of 2007 and future Retrofit Bid Packages are currently being <br />designed, the amount of time required of Kennedy/Jenks staff has increased <br />significantly. This pace will exceed the previously-projected peak level, as all remaining <br />commercial and streetscape irrigation retrofits of the 57 sites are approved and <br />constructed in Redwood Shores and the Seaport area, and additional sites that were <br />not originally included are incorporated into the future bid packages. Homeowner <br />association sites that may voluntarily apply for service were not included in the scope of <br />Amendment No.2 of the agreement. However, staff has received numerous inquiries <br />from homeowner associations who have interest in connecting to the recycled water <br />system and the retrofit cost for these sites has therefore been incorporated into <br />Amendment No.3. <br /> <br />Also included in Amendment No. 3 is the continuing support that Kennedy/Jenks will <br />provide with bidding and construction management services for the additional bid <br />packages, as well as additional customer site supervisor training. And finally, <br />Kennedy/Jenks expertise in the team will support a learning process for new Public <br />Works Services employees, who will follow up the initial retrofits with continuing <br />customer service, regulatory inspections and reporting, and problem-solving as needed. <br />Kennedy/Jenks will also provide technical support and assistance to industrial <br />customers in the Seaport area for their process plant retrofits. Staff has concluded that <br />the original team assumptions about the level of technical/regulatory support services <br />that industrial customers will need for successful completion of retrofit designs were too <br />conservative. What has been learned in working with businesses in the Seaport Area is <br />that technical/operation staff members and their consultants need more guidance and <br />problem-solving help in order to correctly design changes for maximizing the use of <br />recycled water. The team feels that adding Kennedy/Jenks resources, as well as other <br />project assistance, is vital to reaching the goal of maximum industrial conversions by <br />2010. <br /> <br />The anticipated outcome of the changes, emerging challenges, and adding additional <br />retrofit sites as described above is that the project will require a higher level of effort in <br />Phase One than initially estimated. Staff originally expected to return to Council in early <br />2009 with an additional amendment to the agreement. However, staff has gained a <br />more refined understanding of needs for customer site retrofits in both Redwood Shores <br />and the Seaport area. Staff recommends that the City Council approve an additional <br />funding authorization of $862,391, amending the Agreement in the not-to-exceed <br />amount of $862,391, from $1,640,400 to $ 2,502,791. At the current expenditure rate, <br />this amendment should sustain work through at least the end of 2010. <br /> <br />AL TERN A TIVES <br />The work included in the scope of services could be provided by adding city staff for the <br />remaining project period (2008 through 2010). However, this would entail at least six <br />months of delay in the project, and would result in a staff down-sizing at the end of the <br />