Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />provision can have no other meaning and under proponent's <br />interpretation, would be "meaningless surplusage." (Chamber Letter <br />dated June 12,2008, at 5.) The Chamber concludes that a two-thirds vote <br />requirement of the entire electorate would be required "to ratify even minor <br />use permits, parcel map, design review approvals, and other <br />administrative or quasi-judicial entitlements" to the extent the proposals go <br />beyond the "Open Space" uses set forth in the initiative. (Chamber Letter <br />at 5.) <br /> <br />At a minimum, the two provisions on which proponents and the Chamber <br />alternatively rely cannot be easily harmonized and judicial resolution <br />would be necessary if a future dispute arises over the scope of <br />permissible administrative acts under the initiative. <br /> <br />SECTION III: The Initiative's Effect on Various Areas of the City <br /> <br />7. Would the initiative affect Docktown and the Docktown Marina? <br /> <br />Response: Yes, changes to the uses of these areas could require two-thirds voter <br />approval. This area is comprised of two, separately-zoned areas: (1) the <br />area where boat storage occurs has a general plan designation of Office <br />Park Oriented Uses and a zoning designation of Tidal Plain; and (2) the <br />area where boats and houseboats are tied up on Redwood Creek has a <br />general plan designation of San Francisco Bay Waters and a zoning <br />designation of Tidal Plain. Both areas would be covered by the initiative <br />because of the Tidal Plain and San Francisco Bay Waters designations. <br />As a result, any legislative action to change the use of these lands for <br />Non-Open Space Uses would require two-thirds voter approval. <br /> <br />For example. approval by two-thirds of the electorate would be required if <br />this area were to be developed for residential use. The site has been <br />seen as an area that could be developed into a residential and mixed-use <br />neighborhood. City staff recently reviewed a conceptual design plan for <br />the site which was submitted by Trumark. The plan includes residential <br />development at a density of 40 dwelling units per acre and public access <br />along the creek frontage as well as through the site. If the initiative <br />passes, however, this proposal would require two-thirds voter approval <br />because the Zoning Code would have to be amended to permit such <br />development. <br /> <br />8. Would the initiative affect the South Bayside Systems Authority <br />(SBSA) property? <br /> <br />Response: Yes, it could. The South Bayside Systems Authority (SBSA) is a joint <br />powers agency created in 1975 in order to provide sewage treatment for <br />the City and other neighboring cities, including Belmont, and San Carlos <br />and Menlo Park Sanitary District. The SBSA plant is located in the <br />Redwood Shores area and has a general plan designation of Government; <br />some of the buffer area around the plant has a general plan designation of <br />Unimproved Areas (Land or Water). The zoning designation for the SBSA <br />6 <br />